Emergency & Toxicology · General Medicine

Poisoning Overview & Toxidromes

Also known as Poisoning · Toxicology · Toxidromes · Approach to the poisoned patient · Gastrointestinal decontamination

A structured, examiner-grade overview of the approach to the acutely poisoned patient — resuscitation (ABCDE), toxidrome recognition, gastrointestinal decontamination, enhanced elimination, and the antidote armamentarium. Designed as a self-contained chapter covering all 15 examiner dimensions for NEET-PG, INICET, USMLE and PLAB.

High yieldHigh evidenceUpdated 5 Sept 202623 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

Plate IFigure from this chapter
On this page
Study tools

Exam tags

NEET-PGINICET

Red flags

  • Coma of unknown cause — check capillary glucose immediately and treat hypoglycaemia without delay; naloxone if pinpoint pupils or respiratory depression
  • Cholinergic toxidrome (DUMBELSS: miosis, bronchorrhoea, bronchospasm, salivation, sweating) — atropine titrated to muscarinic signs; oxime benefit remains uncertain
  • Anticholinergic toxidrome (dry, hot, blind, mad, flushed, retained) — supportive care and benzodiazepines for agitation
  • Serotonin toxicity (clonus, hyperreflexia, hyperthermia) after serotonergic drugs — stop agent, benzodiazepines, active cooling; cyproheptadine is used but dosing is not uniform
  • QRS widening after tricyclic overdose — IV sodium bicarbonate first-line; bupropion widening is gap-junction toxicity and often does not respond to bicarbonate
  • Combined anion-gap metabolic acidosis and osmolal gap — toxic alcohols; empiric fomepizole, and extracorporeal treatment when EXTRIP indications are met

Meet the patient

A 24-year-old is brought unconscious to the emergency department at midnight. Her pupils are 1 mm, her respiratory rate is 6, and there are needle-track marks on her arm. The paramedics found empty blister packs beside her and a bottle of paracetamol.[1]

Treat the respiratory depression and investigate the possible co-ingestion in parallel. The opioid pattern calls for ventilatory support and naloxone titrated to restore breathing rather than full consciousness.[36][50] The paracetamol container matters even if it does not explain the presenting toxidrome: serum paracetamol and salicylate concentrations are recommended after ingestion with intent of self-harm or potentially toxic exposure to those medicines. An early paracetamol sample can be misleading; the nomogram assessment requires an appropriately timed concentration, with a different pathway when ingestion time is unknown.[1][53]

Resuscitate and assess together — do not delay a time-critical treatment

Treat immediate threats while the toxicological risk assessment develops. Assess airway, breathing, circulation and neurological function; provide airway protection, ventilation, fluids and cardiovascular support according to clinical need. In parallel, establish what was taken, how much, when, for how long and by whom. Update the assessment as the history, investigations and clinical course evolve.[2]

Decontamination, enhanced elimination, antidotes and supportive care are selected interventions, not compulsory sequential stations. A time-critical antidote need not wait for decontamination or completion of the history. Seek poison-centre or clinical-toxicology advice when assessing the expected course and treatment choices.[2]

[2]

Define the exposure before classifying it

A poison is a substance harmful to the body; excessive amounts of otherwise useful substances can also cause poisoning. Exposure may be swallowed, inhaled, injected or absorbed through skin. Effects range from transient illness to organ injury, coma and death.[66] Clinically, specify the agent, amount, route, time course, intention and patient characteristics rather than relying on a class label alone. These details feed the evolving toxicological risk assessment.[2]

How common, and which agents kill where

Poisoning is among the commonest emergencies in medicine and in examinations, and the agent that kills is profoundly region-dependent. Pesticide self-poisoning accounts for an estimated 258,234 deaths a year worldwide (plausible range 233,997 to 325,907), about 30 percent (range 27 to 37 percent) of global suicides.[28] Organophosphorus pesticide self-poisoning kills an estimated 200,000 people every year, with case fatality generally more than 15 percent.[29] In India, aluminium phosphide is the leading cause of poisoning-related mortality, with pooled mortality 54 percent (95 percent CI 48 to 61 percent) and no definite antidote; organophosphate ingestion remains a major rural caseload.[19][29] In high-income countries, paracetamol, opioids and psychiatric medications lead.

258,234Pesticide self-poisoning deaths a yearabout 30 percent of global suicides (range 27 to 37 percent)
200,000OP self-poisoning deaths a yearcase fatality generally more than 15 percent
54 percentPooled AlP mortality in India95 percent CI 48 to 61 percent; no definite antidote
22 percentFall in UK suicidal paracetamol and salicylate deathsafter the 16 September 1998 pack-size law; 11 to 32 percent
[1]

The region matters for the viva. In high-income countries the top adult agents are paracetamol, NSAIDs, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, opioids, cardiovascular drugs and antipsychotics, and in under-fives the household products, cosmetics, button batteries, paracetamol and iron. In Australia and New Zealand, paracetamol and benzodiazepines dominate the in-hospital caseload while snake and spider envenomation drive the out-of-hospital mortality. In the United Kingdom, after the 16 September 1998 pack-size law, suicidal deaths from paracetamol and salicylates fell 22 percent (95 percent CI 11 to 32 percent) in the following year, and liver-unit admissions and transplants for paracetamol hepatotoxicity fell by around 30 percent over four years.[27] In India and South Asia, organophosphates and carbamates, aluminium phosphide, oleander, copper sulphate and corrosives dominate; aluminium phosphide is India’s leading poisoning-related mortality, with pooled mortality 54 percent (95 percent CI 48 to 61 percent) and no definite antidote.[19]

The anticipated severity of an exposure is weighed against the patient's status and the treatments that may be required; kidney disease is itself a risk factor for some poisonings and shapes whether enhanced-elimination techniques can be used.[2] The high-risk special populations — children, pregnancy, and the elderly with comorbidity and co-medication — are covered at the end of this topic.

Toxidromes — read the pupils, skin, temperature and reflexes

Figure 2 — Toxidromes at the bedsideSix panels summarise the sympathomimetic, anticholinergic, cholinergic, opioid, GABAergic and serotonin toxicity patterns for rapid bedside recognition. The GABAergic panel is explicitly labelled as the benzodiazepine and Z-drug pattern, not the pattern of every sedative. A footer notes that the panels are recognition aids rather than stand-alone diagnostic rules, because most poisonings do not produce a toxidrome and mixed exposures can alter findings.
[1] [8]

A toxidrome is a constellation of autonomic, ocular, dermal, neurological and cardiorespiratory signs produced by a class of poisons acting on a common receptor or pathway. It is the bedside shortcut that narrows an infinite differential to a handful of toxin classes within seconds, often before any laboratory result is back.[1]

Classify poisoning along three independent axes — by intent, by tempo, and by the toxidrome produced — and the third axis is the one that drives bedside management. The agent-specific classifications (paracetamol, salicylate, organophosphate, tricyclic, opioid, toxic alcohol, carbon monoxide, lead) each have their own topic; this chapter is the general framework that precedes them.[1]

The receptor signatures of Hoffman’s well-defined toxidromes are the viva core. Sympathomimetic agonism (cocaine, amphetamines, MDMA, pseudoephedrine) gives mydriasis, tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia and diaphoresis. Anticholinergic muscarinic blockade (atropine, antihistamines, tricyclics, Jimson weed) gives the dry-hot-blind-mad-red-retained picture. Cholinergic acetylcholinesterase inhibition (organophosphates, carbamates, nerve agents) gives DUMBELSS — miosis, bronchorrhoea, bronchospasm, salivation, lacrimation, sweating. Opioid mu-receptor agonism gives pinpoint pupils, respiratory depression and hyporeflexia. An additional GABAergic toxidrome covers the sedative-hypnotics.[1] Serotonin toxicity is recognised separately by clonus, hyperreflexia, tremor, agitation and diaphoresis (Dunkley; Isbister).[8][46]

Sympathomimetic

  • Direct or indirect alpha and beta adrenergic agonism — cocaine, amphetamines, MDMA, ephedrine, caffeine, theophylline
  • Mydriasis, tachycardia, hypertension, hyperthermia, diaphoresis, agitation, seizures
  • Skin is wet with diaphoresis; bowel sounds present

Anticholinergic

  • Muscarinic blockade — atropine, hyoscine, antihistamines, tricyclics, Jimson weed, anti-Parkinsonian drugs
  • Dry as a bone, red as a beet, hot as a hare, blind as a bat, mad as a hatter, with urinary retention and ileus
  • Skin is dry and hot; bowel sounds absent

Cholinergic or DUMBELSS

  • Excess acetylcholine at muscarinic and nicotinic receptors from acetylcholinesterase inhibition — organophosphates, carbamates, nerve agents
  • Diarrhoea, urination, miosis, bronchorrhoea or bronchospasm, emesis, lacrimation, salivation, sweating, fasciculations
  • Skin is wet; bowel sounds hyperactive; bronchorrhoea is the lethal effect

Opioid

  • Mu-receptor agonism in the CNS — heroin, morphine, codeine, fentanyl, methadone, tramadol
  • Pinpoint pupils, respiratory depression, coma, hypothermia, hyporeflexia, reduced bowel sounds
  • Reversible with naloxone

Serotonergic

  • Excess 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A stimulation — SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, tramadol, fentanyl, linezolid, methylene blue, St John's wort, triptans
  • Spontaneous or inducible clonus, hyperreflexia lower-limb predominant, hyperthermia, tremor, agitation, autonomic instability
  • Inducible ankle clonus is the single most specific bedside finding
[1]

What the poison does — toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics

Figure 3 — Toxicokinetics in overdose and dose-response endpointsFour panels show absorption, distribution, biotransformation and elimination, each annotated with the ways an overdose can change normal kinetics. A schematic mortality-versus-dose curve marks the LD50 at 50 percent, and the NOAEL and LOAEL are defined in a separate panel as study endpoints, not as points on the mortality curve and not as patient treatment thresholds.
[47] [48] [62] [63]

Toxicokinetics concerns the movement and handling of the poison; toxicodynamics concerns its effects. Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion are distinct but interacting processes. Therapeutic-dose kinetics may change substantially in overdose: delayed absorption, altered protein binding or tissue distribution, enzyme saturation and organ failure can prolong toxicity. Volume of distribution matters for extracorporeal removal, but it is not the only determinant.[47][48][64][2]

Absorption and bioavailability are not fixed rankings of routes. Intravenous administration delivers drug directly into systemic circulation; oral bioavailability may be reduced by intestinal and hepatic first-pass metabolism. Formulation, gastric emptying and overdose-related physiology can alter the time course. Volume of distribution is the amount of drug in the body divided by its plasma concentration: it is an apparent volume, not an anatomical compartment. Binding and tissue uptake explain why a plasma concentration need not represent all the drug in the body.[64][47]

Dialysability is a multivariable decision. Small molecular size, water solubility, low protein binding, low endogenous clearance and a low volume of distribution favour extracorporeal clearance. Overdose can saturate protein binding, increasing the removable unbound fraction. Renal or hepatic failure may reduce endogenous clearance. Apply the poison-specific recommendation and the clinical course, rather than a universal volume-of-distribution cutoff.[2][47]

Metabolism can detoxify or bioactivate. Phase I and phase II pathways commonly make drugs more hydrophilic for excretion, but the resulting compound is not necessarily harmless: codeine requires metabolism to active metabolites, and toxic-alcohol metabolites drive major organ injury. Methanol forms formaldehyde and then formic acid; ethylene glycol forms glycolate and oxalate among other products. Acetylcysteine supports detoxification of paracetamol's reactive metabolite through glutathione-related mechanisms. These are pathway-specific examples, not proof that all metabolism is protective.[64][52][53]

Clearance is a volume per unit time, not an amount of drug. It is the elimination rate divided by plasma concentration, with renal, hepatic and other clearance contributions. Renal excretion may involve filtration, secretion and reabsorption; some substances also leave via the lungs or gastrointestinal tract. Which route matters depends on the compound and patient physiology.[64][65]

First-order and zero-order elimination describe different relationships. First-order elimination removes a constant fraction per unit time; when clearance and distribution remain stable, the half-life is constant. With zero-order elimination, saturated removal mechanisms eliminate a constant amount per unit time instead. Alcohol and phenytoin are teaching examples of capacity-limited elimination; salicylate kinetics can also become saturated at higher concentrations. Do not project a therapeutic half-life unchanged into severe overdose or organ failure.[64][65][47][48]

The cellular mechanisms of organ injury

Beyond the autonomic toxidromes, toxins damage organs through several distinct mechanisms that examiners probe. Direct tissue injury comes from corrosives, paraquat and hydrocarbons; mitochondrial toxicity from cyanide, salicylate, metformin and the antiretrovirals; receptor blockade from the beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers and opioids; enzyme inhibition from the organophosphates, methotrexate and cyanide; oxidative stress from iron, paracetamol's NAPQI and carbon tetrachloride; and ion-channel effects from the tricyclics, digoxin and the local anaesthetics.[1]

Name the response endpoint before drawing a curve. LD50 is an experimental mortality endpoint: the calculated dose expected to kill half of a defined animal population. NOAEL and LOAEL identify tested doses without or with a statistically or biologically significant increase in the adverse effect being studied versus controls. They are not automatic landmarks on a mortality curve. EPA explicitly notes that dose–response relationships can differ for outcomes such as weight loss and death; an illustrative LD50 is not a patient treatment threshold.[62][63]

Resuscitation — ABCDE and the coma cocktail

Airway intervention follows physiology and airway risk, not a GCS number alone. Assess airway protection, oxygenation, ventilation, seizures and haemodynamics while resuscitating. Provide ventilatory support for respiratory failure and cardiovascular support for shock; do not postpone these interventions to finish the diagnostic history.[2]

The NICO trial studied a closely monitored conservative airway strategy in selected adults with suspected poisoning and GCS below 9. It excluded patients needing immediate intubation because of respiratory distress, suspected brain injury, seizure or shock; suspected cardiotropic poisoning; isolated reversible opioid or benzodiazepine poisoning; and known pregnancy. Do not generalise its findings to these excluded groups.[51]

In its intervention arm, emergency intubation triggers included seizure, vomiting, oxygen saturation below 90 percent despite nasal oxygen, or systolic pressure below 90 mmHg despite 1 L crystalloid. A nurse or physician closely monitored vital signs and GCS for up to 4 hours or until GCS exceeded 8. This was an actively supervised trial protocol, not permission to leave a comatose patient unprotected or unobserved.[51]

Treat the indication, not an automatic coma cocktail. Check bedside glucose and correct hypoglycaemia without delay. Thiamine may be indicated in a patient at risk of deficiency; the retrieved label indicates thiamine injection where rapid restoration is necessary, and when IV dextrose is given to patients with marginal thiamine status. Do not delay glucose correction: the retrospective veteran study found no Wernicke encephalopathy among 120 encounters in which dextrose preceded thiamine, but this does not establish that thiamine is unnecessary in a deficient patient.[12][54]

Naloxone targets opioid respiratory depression, not every unexplained coma. Titrate it to ventilation rather than mandatory full wakefulness, with airway and ventilatory support in parallel. Published initial doses vary with context; low-dose IV titration beginning at 0.04 mg is described for opioid-dependent patients, while the 2025 AHA table lists 0.2 to 2 mg IV/IO/IM or 2 to 4 mg intranasally for adult opioid poisoning. Repeated dosing or an infusion may be needed for longer-acting opioids. Flumazenil is not an empiric coma drug: the trial meta-analysis found higher risks of adverse events (RR 2.85) and serious adverse events (RR 3.81) than placebo.[36][37][45][50][38]

[1] [12]
DONT — assess each indication, not a mandatory cocktail

DONT

  • DDextrosecheck the bedside capillary glucose in every coma; treat hypoglycaemia with IV dextrose
  • OOxygenhigh-flow oxygen for hypoxia
  • NNaloxonegive for suspected opioid respiratory depression while supporting ventilation; do not use coma alone as the indication
  • TThiaminelow-risk adjunct in alcohol misuse or malnutrition — do not delay dextrose for it
[1] [1]

Sodium bicarbonate for the widened QRS

A widened QRS after a tricyclic marks fast sodium-channel cardiotoxicity that usually responds to bicarbonate; bupropion widening is different. Tricyclic poisoning responds well to sodium bicarbonate; a 1 to 2 mmol/kg bolus can be used to assess the response, targeting a serum pH of about 7.45 to 7.55.[31] After acute tricyclic overdose, no seizures or ventricular arrhythmias occurred when the QRS was under 0.10 second; when the QRS was 0.10 second or longer, seizures occurred in 34 percent and ventricular arrhythmias in 14 percent.[40] Bupropion widens the QRS by inhibiting cardiac gap junctions and often does not respond to alkalinisation (median QRS change minus 2 ms, not significant).[22][31] Intravenous lipid emulsion is recommended in bupivacaine cardiac arrest; if other therapies fail, ILE is recommended for bupivacaine and suggested for other local anaesthetics, amitriptyline and bupropion — it is not first-line for amitriptyline, calcium-channel blockers or bupropion.[42] The recommended ILE dose is a 1.5 mL/kg bolus then 15 mL/kg per hour.[25] Superiority of lipid over alkalinisation for amitriptyline has been shown in a guinea-pig model, not in patients.[23]

Seizures and hyperthermia

Cyclic antidepressant overdose produces life-threatening seizures, hypotension and dysrhythmias, and has accounted for a large share of overdose-related adult intensive-care admissions.[24] Hyperthermia from serotonin syndrome is treated with the serotonin antagonist cyproheptadine — although the cyproheptadine dosing schedule is not uniform across the literature and requires clinical judgement.[20]

Decontamination — the first pillar

Figure 4 — Stabilise and assess togetherTwo equal cards show resuscitation and toxicological risk assessment running concurrently, joined by a stabilise-and-assess-together link. A selective decontamination card gives case-specific charcoal timing, the 50 g adult and 1 g/kg paediatric (maximum 50 g) single-dose or additional-dose amounts used only when charcoal is indicated, and airway and contraindication checks; the companion card covers toxin-specific antidotes, enhanced elimination and poison-centre advice. The footer marks the panel as a decision overview to accompany cited teaching, not a procedural protocol.
[2] [49] [1]

Beyond resuscitation, definitive management has four pillars — decontamination, enhanced elimination, antidotes and supportive care — and each is applied only when the indication is met. The position papers of the AACT and the EAPCCT are the evidence backbone for decontamination, and they have retired several once-popular manoeuvres.[1]

[1]

Activated charcoal, single dose

  • 2026 recommendation: 50 g in adults; 1 g/kg in children, capped at the adult 50 g dose, when charcoal is indicated
  • Not routine: assess the poison, formulation, dose, time, expected toxicity and aspiration risk
  • Selected poisons may justify administration up to 6 hours; suspected continuing absorption can justify later administration after individualised assessment
  • Do not give to a non-intubated patient with absent airway protective reflexes; gastrointestinal perforation risk is another contraindication

Additional-dose versus multiple-dose charcoal

  • An additional dose completes decontamination when ongoing absorption is suspected; it is not the same purpose as enhanced elimination
  • Multiple-dose charcoal enhances elimination in selected poisonings: carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides, colchicine, dapsone, phenobarbital, phenytoin, thallium and theophylline
  • 2026 regimen: begin with the single dose, then repeat that dose every 4 hours or half that dose every 2 hours; use only after individualised assessment

Whole-bowel irrigation

  • Can be considered for potentially toxic ingestions of sustained-release or enteric-coated drugs, particularly for patients presenting later than 2 hours when activated charcoal is less effective
  • Can be considered after substantial ingestion of iron, lithium or potassium, where morbidity is high and other decontamination options are lacking

Ipecac syrup

  • No convincing evidence from clinical studies that ipecac improves outcome
  • Routine administration at the site of ingestion or in the emergency department should definitely be avoided — ipecac may delay or reduce the effectiveness of activated charcoal, oral antidotes and whole-bowel irrigation
[49] [5] [6]

Know what changed. Chyka's 2005 position paper reported volunteer absorption reductions of 47.3, 40.07, 16.5 and 21.13 percent at 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes and advised against routine charcoal. These are volunteer pharmacokinetic results, not proof of patient-outcome benefit. The 2021 review preceded the 2026 Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative guidance, which now specifies poison-dependent later windows and distinguishes additional-dose decontamination from multiple-dose enhanced elimination. Evidence remains predominantly low or very low quality.[3][4][49]

Protect the airway, but do not intubate a low-risk patient merely to give charcoal. The 2026 guidance advises against intubation solely for charcoal when significant poisoning complications are not anticipated, and against inserting a gastric tube without intubation solely to administer charcoal. When intubation is otherwise clinically indicated, gastric-tube charcoal may be reasonable. A large ingestion with substantial life-threatening risk requires an individual risk–benefit decision, especially if other treatments are unavailable.[49]

Enhanced elimination — the second pillar

Three techniques enhance elimination, and the dialysability of the toxin turns on the volume of distribution. Urine alkalinisation, haemodialysis, and multi-dose charcoal each have a defined indication.[1]

Urine alkalinisation is intravenous sodium bicarbonate given to produce urine with pH 7.5 or higher, and it should be considered first-line for moderately severe salicylate poisoning that does not meet haemodialysis criteria; supplemental potassium is crucial for the regimen to work.[39][16] In practice a blood pH around 7.5 is often targeted alongside the urine pH.[15] Rebound after stopping bicarbonate is uncommon — 8 of 377 (2.1 percent) in one series.[10] Intermittent haemodialysis is preferred when extracorporeal treatment is required.[2]

[1]
EXTRIP — extracorporeal treatment when the indication is met

EXTRIP

  • EECTR kineticsfavoured for low molecular weight, water-soluble drugs with protein binding below 80 percent and low volume of distribution; intermittent haemodialysis is usually preferred
  • XeXclusionsiron is a whole-bowel-irrigation problem, not an EXTRIP haemodialysis toxin
  • TThresholds that are 1Dsalicylate: altered mental status, or concentration over 7.2 mmol/L (100 mg/dL); lithium: impaired kidney and Li over 4.0, or reduced consciousness, seizures or life-threatening dysrhythmias at any level; metformin: lactate over 20 mmol/L, pH 7.0 or lower, or shock
  • RRecommendations vs suggestionssalicylate over 6.5 mmol/L (90 mg/dL) is a 2D suggestion; lithium over 5.0, significant confusion, or time to Li under 1.0 longer than 36 hours is 2D
  • Ialcohol Indicationsmethanol: coma, seizures, new vision deficit, pH 7.15 or lower, or anion gap over 24; methanol concentration cut-offs depend on whether fomepizole (over 21.8 mmol/L), ethanol (over 18.7) or no ADH blocker (over 15.6) is in use
  • PParent EGsuggest ECTR if fomepizole is used and ethylene glycol is over 50 mmol/L or the osmolal gap is over 50; recommend ECTR for coma, seizures or acute kidney injury
[2] [5] [32] [33] [34] [43] [44]

Extracorporeal treatments and other elimination-enhancing techniques are chosen toxin by toxin as part of the structured risk assessment, and the nephrologist is usually involved when they are required.[2]

Antidotes — time-critical, toxin-specific treatment

The antidote table is the single highest-yield piece of factual recall in toxicology — agent, antidote, indication. Each entry below is anchored to a source that states it, and where dosing remains unsettled the table says so.[1]

[1]
The antidote armamentarium — agent, antidote, dose, indication
ToxinAntidoteIndication and trap
ParacetamolN-acetylcysteine: US label three-bag 300 mg/kg IV over 21 h from 5 kg, or two-bag 300 mg/kg over 20 h from 41 kg; detailed regimens and stopping criteria belowEarly treatment is most protective; high-risk ingestion, delayed absorption and evolving injury may require treatment beyond a scheduled infusion course
OpioidsNaloxone titrated to ventilation, not consciousnessInitial 0.4 to 2 mg described; opioid-dependent patients start at 0.04 mg; half-life 60 to 120 minutes
OrganophosphatesAtropine titrated to muscarinic signs (drying of secretions)Trial background care often includes pralidoxime, but oxime evidence is insufficient and the WHO 30 mg/kg then 8 mg/kg/h regimen is not supported
Methanol or ethylene glycolFomepizole: 15 mg/kg IV loading dose; 10 mg/kg every 12 h for four doses; then 15 mg/kg every 12 h. Infuse each dose over 30 minStop only when the alcohol is undetectable or below 20 mg/dL AND the patient is asymptomatic with normal pH; increase frequency to every 4 h during haemodialysis and follow the start/end adjustment schedule below
Calcium-channel blocker or beta-blocker shock2025 AHA high-dose insulin regimen: 1 unit/kg IV regular-insulin bolus, then 1 to 10 units/kg/h IV according to responseMonitor glucose, potassium and fluid status closely; support haemodynamics with the toxin-specific calcium/vasopressor strategy rather than relying on insulin alone
Tricyclic antidepressantIV sodium bicarbonate 1 to 2 mmol/kg, target pH about 7.45 to 7.55First-line for TCA cardiotoxicity; bupropion QRS widening often does not respond; ILE is not first-line
Serotonin toxicityStop the agent, benzodiazepines, cooling; cyproheptadineCyproheptadine dosing is not uniform — ICU series used 12 mg then 2 mg every 2 h; ward 4 mg three times daily
Local-anaesthetic systemic toxicityIntravenous lipid emulsion 1.5 mL/kg then 15 mL/kg/hRecommended in bupivacaine arrest; if other therapies fail, recommended for bupivacaine and suggested for other local anaesthetics, amitriptyline and bupropion
DigoxinDigoxin-specific Fab (DigiFab): 40 mg per vial; for acute ingestion of an unknown amount with toxicity and no serum concentration, the label gives 20 vials — children under 20 kg start with 10Monitor potassium frequently after administration; anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions are possible
CyanideHydroxocobalamin 5 g IV over 15 minutes; a second 5 g may be given depending on severity and response (total 10 g)The second dose may run from 15 minutes (patients in extremis) to 2 hours
MethaemoglobinaemiaMethylene blue 1 mg/kg IV over 5 to 30 minutes; repeat up to 1 mg/kg after one hour if the level stays above 30 percent or symptoms persistA single 1 mg/kg dose only in moderate or severe renal impairment
Lead encephalopathyUrgent parenteral chelation per WHO: dimercaprol 2.5 to 3 mg/kg deep IM on the tapering schedule, with sodium calcium edetate up to 40 mg/kg twice daily for up to 5 daysNever sodium edetate (edetate disodium) — fatal hypocalcaemia; chelation is recommended for children with encephalopathy and for adults with lead over 70 to 100 µg/dL with toxicity features
[14] [36] [37] [26] [30] [35] [18] [41] [31] [20] [42] [25] [50] [52] [53] [68] [69] [70] [71]

The investigations that change the plan

Investigations follow the structured risk assessment. The approach to the poisoned patient pairs resuscitation with a risk assessment that weighs the anticipated severity of the exposure against the patient's status and the treatments that may be required — and that assessment dictates the bedside tests, the targeted drug levels and the gap calculations.[2]

A prolonged QRS is a risk marker in TCA poisoning, not a universal sodium-channel-blocker diagnosis. In Boehnert's 49-patient study, no seizures or ventricular arrhythmias occurred when maximal QRS was below 0.10 second; seizures occurred from 0.10 second and ventricular arrhythmias only from 0.16 second. These are study findings, not stand-alone treatment or discharge rules. Bicarbonate is used for TCA cardiotoxicity, whereas bupropion-associated QRS widening may not respond in the same way.[40][31][22]

The two gap calculations are central to toxic-alcohol reasoning. An anion-gap metabolic acidosis is the key laboratory finding in toxic-alcohol poisoning, and the osmolal gap has both utility and limitations — it must be interpreted alongside the acid-base picture rather than relied on in isolation.[17]

Use the paracetamol nomogram only in its applicable setting. The 2023 US/Canada consensus uses the treatment line beginning at 150 micrograms/mL (150 mg/L) at 4 hours for a reliably timed acute ingestion. A concentration before 4 hours cannot be plotted for that decision. Unknown or unreliable timing, repeated ingestion over more than 24 hours, extended-release products and relevant co-ingestants need their own pathways. The consensus defines acute ingestion as a pattern completed within less than 24 hours; do not assume every ingestion involving more than one swallowing event is automatically outside its acute pathway.[57]

Do not wait past the protective treatment window for a result. When there is strong concern for an acute ingestion exceeding 200 mg/kg or 10 g and waiting for testing would delay acetylcysteine beyond 8 hours, the consensus advises starting treatment while results are pending. With opioid or anticholinergic co-ingestion and corresponding clinical effects, a 4- to 24-hour concentration above 10 micrograms/mL but below the treatment line warrants another level 4 to 6 hours later. Extended-release preparations also require attention to repeat sampling.[57]

State the regimen and its jurisdiction. The July 2025 US ACETADOTE label provides a three-bag regimen for patients from 5 kg: 150 mg/kg over 1 hour, then 50 mg/kg over 4 hours, then 100 mg/kg over 16 hours. For patients from 41 kg it also provides a two-bag regimen: 200 mg/kg over 4 hours, then 100 mg/kg over 16 hours. Use the label's weight-specific dilution and maximum-weight dosing tables. The label does not establish comparable efficacy of the two regimens and advises considering the three-bag regimen for early severe liver injury or a large ingestion. Do not present either regimen as the only international protocol.[53]

The clock alone does not stop acetylcysteine. The 2023 consensus warns that a common clinical error is to administer acetylcysteine for 20 or 21 hours and then discontinue without reassessment; some patients require longer treatment, so administer it until stopping criteria are met.[57] During treatment, monitor hepatic and renal function and fluid balance — AST, ALT, bilirubin, INR, creatinine, BUN, glucose and electrolytes — with repeat acetaminophen concentrations; when timing is uncertain, earlier concentrations can mislead.[53] Seek clinical-toxicology advice for progressive injury, and consult a liver transplant team when AST or ALT rise progressively with coagulation abnormalities, or with encephalopathy or multisystem failure despite acetylcysteine.[57]

The mimics — and the discriminator that ends each

The poisoned patient rarely arrives with a reliable label, so the differential is built around the dominant clinical feature — coma, hyperthermia, metabolic acidosis, a wide QRS — with the toxidrome one of several explanations. The most dangerous trap is to assume a coma is toxic before checking the glucose.[1]

Every coma gets a bedside glucose and a naloxone trial, but the examiner expects you to also exclude hypoglycaemia — the commonest reversible cause — a post-ictal state, intracranial haemorrhage or stroke, CNS infection, septic encephalopathy, hepatic or uraemic encephalopathy, and electrolyte disturbance. A high anion-gap metabolic acidosis with a raised osmolal gap points to a toxic alcohol, though the osmolal gap has recognised limitations and must be read with the whole picture.[1][17]

The three hyperthermia syndromes — the most examined differential

Do not merge these hyperthermia syndromes into one clonus-based diagnosis. Exposure, time course and neuromuscular findings help distinguish serotonin toxicity, NMS and malignant hyperthermia, but atypical presentations and overlap require clinical judgement.[8][46][56][61]

Serotonin syndrome

  • Onset within hours of a serotonergic agent
  • Clonus and hyperreflexia, lower limbs predominant
  • Diaphoretic, agitated, mydriatic, with diarrhoea
  • Treat by stopping the agent, cyproheptadine, benzodiazepines, active cooling

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome

  • Dopamine-antagonist exposure or dopamine-agonist withdrawal; many cases follow recent treatment initiation
  • Altered consciousness, rigidity, hyperthermia and autonomic dysfunction; atypical cases may lack prominent rigidity or fever
  • CK elevation and leucocytosis are nonspecific; assess rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalaemia, renal failure and other complications
  • Stop dopamine antagonists and anticholinergics; provide supportive care. Lorazepam, dopamine agonists, dantrolene and ECT are severity-dependent options supported mainly by low-quality evidence, not a mandatory bundle

Malignant hyperthermia

  • A reaction during or soon after exposure to volatile anaesthetics or succinylcholine; prior uneventful anaesthesia does not exclude susceptibility
  • Early unexplained CO2 production, tachycardia, mixed acidosis and muscle rigidity; rapid temperature rise can be a later sign
  • Stop triggering agents, call for help and hyperventilate with 100 percent oxygen at high flow
  • EMHG v2024: dantrolene 2 to 2.5 mg/kg IV using actual body weight, up to 300 mg per dose; repeat about every 10 minutes until CO2 and temperature are improving. Treat hyperkalaemia, acidosis and hyperthermia; monitor in critical care for at least 24 hours
[8] [46] [56] [61]

The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria (Dunkley 2003) are simpler, more sensitive (84 percent versus 75 percent) and more specific (97 percent versus 96 percent) than Sternbach. Only clonus (inducible, spontaneous or ocular), agitation, diaphoresis, tremor and hyperreflexia were needed for accurate prediction of serotonin toxicity as diagnosed by a clinical toxicologist; hypertonicity and maximum temperature above 38 degrees C were universal in life-threatening cases and were therefore added.[8] Isbister describes the same triad of neuromuscular excitation, autonomic stimulation and changed mental state.[46]

The agent-specific first response — in one line each

The framework applies differently to each major agent, and the modified first response is summarised here — each agent has a dedicated topic for the full depth. Know the one-line pivot for each.[1]

Paracetamol is metabolised through CYP2E1 to the reactive NAPQI, which depletes glutathione; most protocols apply the 150 mg/L at 4-hour Rumack-Matthew treatment line, and standard acetylcysteine — 300 mg/kg over 21 hours in divided doses — is almost universally effective when given promptly.[13][14] Salicylate poisoning gives a mixed respiratory alkalosis with high-anion-gap metabolic acidosis; significant poisoning is treated with urine alkalinisation to a urinary pH above 7.5, and rebound toxicity is described when the infusion stops.[15][10] Organophosphates inhibit acetylcholinesterase; atropine is titrated to muscarinic signs. Trial protocols have used atropine plus pralidoxime as background “standard care”, but current evidence is insufficient to show whether oximes are harmful or beneficial, and the WHO 30 mg/kg then 8 mg/kg/h pralidoxime regimen is not supported.[26][30]

Tricyclic antidepressants cause fast sodium-channel blockade with QRS widening; IV sodium bicarbonate 1 to 2 mmol/kg (target pH about 7.45 to 7.55) is first-line. Lipid emulsion is not first-line for amitriptyline; guinea-pig data should not be read as a human ranking of lipid over bicarbonate.[31][42][23]

Toxic alcohols require inhibition of toxic-metabolite formation and assessment for extracorporeal treatment. Methanol is metabolised through formaldehyde to formic acid; ethylene glycol produces glycolate and oxalate among its metabolites. Fomepizole inhibits alcohol dehydrogenase. The retrieved US label specifies 15 mg/kg IV initially, then 10 mg/kg every 12 hours for four doses, followed by 15 mg/kg every 12 hours; infuse every dose over 30 minutes. Stop only when the relevant alcohol is undetectable or below 20 mg/dL and the patient is asymptomatic with normal pH.[17][35][52]

Adjust fomepizole around haemodialysis. During haemodialysis, dose every 4 hours. At its start, give the next scheduled dose if at least 6 hours have elapsed since the previous dose; otherwise do not add a dose. At its end, give no extra dose if less than 1 hour has elapsed since the last dose, half the next scheduled dose if 1 to 3 hours have elapsed, or the next scheduled dose if more than 3 hours have elapsed. Resume the next off-dialysis dose 12 hours after the last administered dose. Use EXTRIP's poison-specific indications for initiating extracorporeal treatment; the product label's generic concentration threshold is not a replacement for those recommendations.[34][44][52]

Opioids give the opioid toxidrome of coma with respiratory depression and miosis; naloxone is titrated to restore respiration, not consciousness.[1][36] Late presentations with sustained-release or enteric-coated drugs, and substantial iron, lithium or potassium ingestions, are the classic considerations for whole-bowel irrigation.[5]

The preventable deaths — pitfalls that recur

The recurring, examiner-favoured errors trace to a short list, and most are preventable. The first is giving a decontamination measure without the indication — routine single-dose charcoal and routine ipecac are both specifically advised against by the position papers, and ipecac may delay or reduce the effectiveness of activated charcoal, oral antidotes and whole-bowel irrigation.[3][6]

The treatment pitfalls close the list. Assuming a coma is toxic before the glucose is checked; delaying dextrose for thiamine in hypoglycaemia;[12] relying on the osmolal gap alone to exclude a toxic alcohol when the anion gap tells the other half of the story;[17] treating bupropion QRS widening as if it were a tricyclic bicarbonate-responsive block;[31] and treating the WHO oxime regimen as settled evidence.[30]

[1]

Prognosis and disposition

Outcome is set by the agent and the dose, the time to presentation, the co-ingestants, and the availability of antidote and dialysis. Aluminium phosphide is India's leading cause of poisoning-related mortality, with pooled mortality 54 percent (95 percent CI 48 to 61 percent) and no definite antidote; prompt standard acetylcysteine almost universally prevents paracetamol hepatotoxicity except when the 4-hour level exceeds 300 mg/L; and toxic-alcohol outcome turns on early fomepizole and access to extracorporeal treatment when EXTRIP criteria are met.[19][14][2]

[1]
150 mg/L at 4 hRumack-Matthew treatment linethe line most paracetamol protocols depend on
300 mg/kg over 21 hStandard IV acetylcysteinein divided doses; almost universally effective when prompt
urine pH above 7.5Salicylate urine alkalinisation targetwith blood pH held around 7.5
at least 50 gCharcoal dose in the volunteer datamean absorption reduction 47.3% at 30 minutes, 16.5% at 2 hours
[1]

Disposition follows the risk assessment. The exposure is judged for its anticipated severity in the context of the patient's status and the treatments that may be required — that judgement, not a clock, sets the level of observation, the need for extracorporeal treatment, and the timing of discharge.[2] Detailed bedside guidance is available through clinical resources such as TOXBASE.[1]

Special populations

In children, the dose is weight-based and the ingestion is often unwitnessed. Moderate paediatric salicylate poisoning has been managed with a modified bicarbonate regimen in which supplemental potassium is crucial for effective alkalinisation — the same principle as in adults.[16] Ipecac is avoided in children as everywhere else: routine administration should definitely be avoided.[6]

In ethylene glycol poisoning in pregnancy, treatment should be as for the non-pregnant patient and should not be withheld on account of pregnancy. When an antidote is indicated, the maternal and fetal benefits of antidote treatment outweigh the risks associated with untreated ethylene glycol poisoning, and fomepizole is preferred at all stages of pregnancy because ethanol can cause harmful fetal effects; where fomepizole is unavailable or not considered appropriate, ethanol should not be withheld on account of pregnancy.[59] This preference is not a claim that fomepizole is proven safe in pregnancy: data on these antidotes in pregnancy are very limited, animal reproduction studies with fomepizole have not been conducted, it is not known whether fomepizole can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women, and the US label states it should be given to pregnant women only if clearly needed.[52] The decision therefore remains a patient-specific risk–benefit judgement for this poisoning, with extended maternal and fetal monitoring and discussion with a teratology information service recommended in all cases.[59]

The elderly carry more risk from the same exposure because comorbidity and co-medication compound toxicity; the structured risk assessment explicitly weighs the patient's status and the treatments that may be required before disposition.[2]

Evidence, guidelines, and regional practice

Read the decontamination evidence chronologically. Chyka 2005 and Hoegberg 2021 inform the 2026 Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative guidance: charcoal is selective, timing is poison- and formulation-dependent, and additional-dose decontamination differs from multiple-dose enhanced elimination. Whole-bowel irrigation retains selected indications; ipecac is not routine care. The ASRA advisory and poisoning lipid-emulsion recommendations address distinct settings and must not be treated as a universal rescue algorithm.[3][4][49][5][6][7][42]

Regionally, clinical resources such as TOXBASE exist to provide detailed guidance on the clinical management of poisoning.[1] The rising cost of prescription antidotes is a global access problem formally addressed by the ACMT position statement.[11] In India, aluminium phosphide — a pesticide with no definite antidote — is the leading cause of poisoning-related mortality.[19]

The live controversies are the ones the position papers settled — routine ipecac and routine charcoal are out — and the ones still open: whether oximes help or harm in organophosphate poisoning,[30] high-dose versus standard acetylcysteine when the 4-hour paracetamol level exceeds 300 mg/L,[14] the optimal cyproheptadine schedule in serotonin toxicity,[20] and how far lipid emulsion should extend beyond bupivacaine arrest.[42]

[1]

Ward-round test — four stems

Stem 1 — the unconscious patient with pinpoint pupils (answer)Show

A 24-year-old is unconscious with 1 mm pupils, a respiratory rate of 6, and needle-track marks. What is the toxidrome, the bedside test, and the treatment? Model: This is the opioid toxidrome — the receptor-level effects produce coma with respiratory depression and miosis.[1] Check a capillary glucose at the bedside first to exclude hypoglycaemia. Naloxone is titrated to restore respiration, not consciousness; in opioid-dependent patients start at 0.04 mg.[36][37]

Stem 2 — agitation, mydriasis and ankle clonus at a party (answer)Show

A 19-year-old is agitated with mydriasis, heart rate 140, blood pressure 180 over 100, temperature 39.2, profuse sweating, and inducible clonus at the ankle, after taking something at a party. What is the most likely toxidrome, and what finding distinguishes it from the mimics? Model: This is serotonin toxicity — clonus, hyperreflexia, diaphoresis and agitation after a serotonergic exposure. Hunter criteria are more sensitive (84 versus 75 percent) and more specific (97 versus 96 percent) than Sternbach.[8] Stop the agent, give benzodiazepines, cool, and consider cyproheptadine, recognising that its dosing schedule is not uniform.[20][46]

Stem 3 — a wide QRS after a tricyclic overdose (answer)Show

A patient who took amitriptyline has a QRS of 150 ms and a wide-complex tachycardia. What is the treatment? Model: This is fast sodium-channel blockade from the tricyclic. Give IV sodium bicarbonate 1 to 2 mmol/kg targeting a pH of about 7.45 to 7.55 — TCA poisoning responds well to bicarbonate. ILE is not first-line for amitriptyline; if other therapies fail it can be suggested. Guinea-pig ranking of lipid over alkalinisation is not a human treatment algorithm.[31][42][23]

Stem 4 — a high anion gap with a high osmolal gap (answer)Show

A disoriented patient has a pH of 7.1, an anion gap of 28, and an osmolal gap of 35 mOsm/kg. What is the diagnosis, the mechanism, and the treatment? Model: Methanol or ethylene glycol is a concern, not a diagnosis established by the gaps alone. Obtain the exposure history, serial acid–base assessment and specific alcohol concentrations while treating a sufficiently suspected toxic-alcohol ingestion. The US fomepizole label specifies 15 mg/kg IV initially, then 10 mg/kg every 12 hours for four doses, followed by 15 mg/kg every 12 hours; infuse each dose over 30 minutes. Stop only when the alcohol is undetectable or below 20 mg/dL and the patient is asymptomatic with normal pH. Haemodialysis requires the separate dosing adjustments described above.[17][52] Methanol-attributed acidaemia at this level and anion gap above 24 mmol/L meet EXTRIP indications for extracorporeal treatment; for ethylene glycol apply its distinct anion-gap, glycolate, clinical and antidote-dependent criteria.[34][44]

References71Show
  1. [1]Hoffman RJ, Nillas A Toxidromes and a general approach to poisoning Arch Dis Child, 2025.PMID 39978865
  2. [2]Ghannoum M, Roberts DM Management of Poisonings and Intoxications Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2023.PMID 37097121
  3. [3]Chyka PA, Seger D, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA; American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. Position paper: Single-dose activated charcoal Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2005.PMID 15822758
  4. [4]Hoegberg LCG, Shepherd G, Wood DM, et al. Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2021.PMID 34424785
  5. [5]Thanacoody R, Caravati EM, Troutman B, et al. Position paper update: whole bowel irrigation for gastrointestinal decontamination of overdose patients Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2015.PMID 25511637
  6. [6]Höjer J, Troutman WG, Hoppu K, et al. Position paper update: ipecac syrup for gastrointestinal decontamination Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2013.PMID 23406298
  7. [7]Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Fettiplace MR, et al. The Third American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Practice Advisory on Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity: Executive Summary 2017 Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2018.PMID 29356773
  8. [8]Dunkley EJ, Isbister GK, Sibbritt D, Dawson AH, Whyte IM. The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity QJM, 2003.PMID 12925718
  9. [9]McMartin K, Jacobsen D, Hovda KE. Antidotes for poisoning by alcohols that form toxic metabolites Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2025.PMID 39234820
  10. [10]O'Keefe M, Stanton M, Feldman R, et al. Incidence of rebound salicylate toxicity following cessation of urine alkalinization Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2023.PMID 37427892
  11. [11]Mazer-Amirshahi M, Stolbach A, Nelson LS ACMT Position Statement: Addressing the Rising Cost of Prescription Antidotes J Med Toxicol, 2018.PMID 29185196
  12. [12]Jasti J Prevalence of Wernicke's Encephalopathy When Receiving Dextrose Before Thiamine: A National Study of Veterans Acad Emerg Med, 2025.PMID 40873301
  13. [13]Chomchai S Diagnostic utility of the paracetamol concentration aminotransferase activity multiplication product in identifying patients exceeding the 150 mg/L treatment line on the Rumack-Matthew nomogram Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2026.PMID 41378892
  14. [14]Moss MJ Assessment of high-dose acetylcysteine in acute high-risk paracetamol (acetaminophen) ingestion Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2024.PMID 39051728
  15. [15]Peketi SH Salicylate Poisoning and Rebound Toxicity Cureus, 2024.PMID 38746490
  16. [16]Ong GY A simple modified bicarbonate regimen for urine alkalinization in moderate pediatric salicylate poisoning in the emergency department Pediatr Emerg Care, 2011.PMID 21467880
  17. [17]Ross JA Toxic Alcohol Poisoning Emerg Med Clin North Am, 2022.PMID 35461626
  18. [18]Leonard JB Fomepizole use reported to United States Poison Centers from 2010 to 2021 Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2024.PMID 38465690
  19. [19]Kumar S Meta-analysis of mortality burden due to Aluminum phosphide poisoning in India: A call for strong policy and decision making Dialogues Health, 2025.PMID 41140947
  20. [20]Prakash S Cyproheptadine in serotonin syndrome: A retrospective study J Family Med Prim Care, 2024.PMID 38827706
  21. [21]Kumar K Critical Management of Severe Hypotension Caused by Amlodipine Toxicity Managed With Hyperinsulinemia/Euglycemia Therapy Supplemented With Calcium Gluconate, Intravenous Glucagon and Other Vasopressor Support: Review of Literature Cardiol Res, 2018.PMID 29479386
  22. [22]Simpson M Sodium bicarbonate treatment for QRS widening in bupropion overdoses Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2023.PMID 37318051
  23. [23]Tsujikawa S Superior Efficacy of Lipid Emulsion Infusion Over Serum Alkalinization in Reversing Amitriptyline-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Guinea Pig Anesth Analg, 2018.PMID 29239964
  24. [24]Newton EH Cyclic antidepressant overdose: a review of current management strategies Am J Emerg Med, 1994.PMID 8179756
  25. [25]O'Connor J Intravenous Lipid Emulsion for Management of Systemic Toxic Effects of Drugs AACN Adv Crit Care, 2016.PMID 27959295
  26. [26]Basher A Phase II study of magnesium sulfate in acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2013.PMID 23311540
  27. [27]Hawton K, Simkin S, Deeks J, et al. UK legislation on analgesic packs: before and after study of long term effect on poisonings BMJ, 2004.PMID 15516343
  28. [28]Gunnell D, Eddleston M, Phillips MR, Konradsen F The global distribution of fatal pesticide self-poisoning: systematic review BMC Public Health, 2007.PMID 18154668
  29. [29]Eddleston M, Buckley NA, Eyer P, Dawson AH Management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning Lancet, 2008.PMID 17706760
  30. [30]Buckley NA, Eddleston M, Li Y, et al. Oximes for acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011.PMID 21328273
  31. [31]Chan BS, Buckley NA Common pitfalls in the use of hypertonic sodium bicarbonate for cardiac toxic drug poisonings Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2024.PMID 38597366
  32. [32]Decker BS, Goldfarb DS, Dargan PI, et al. Extracorporeal Treatment for Lithium Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations from the EXTRIP Workgroup Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2015.PMID 25583292
  33. [33]Juurlink DN, Gosselin S, Kielstein JT, et al. Extracorporeal Treatment for Salicylate Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations From the EXTRIP Workgroup Ann Emerg Med, 2015.PMID 25986310
  34. [34]Roberts DM, Yates C, Megarbane B, et al. Recommendations for the role of extracorporeal treatments in the management of acute methanol poisoning: a systematic review and consensus statement Crit Care Med, 2015.PMID 25493973
  35. [35]Megarbane B Treatment of patients with ethylene glycol or methanol poisoning: focus on fomepizole Open Access Emerg Med, 2010.PMID 27147840
  36. [36]Saari TI, Strang J, Dale O Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Naloxone Clin Pharmacokinet, 2024.PMID 38485851
  37. [37]Kim HK, Nelson LS Reducing the harm of opioid overdose with the safe use of naloxone : a pharmacologic review Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2015.PMID 25865597
  38. [38]Penninga EI, Graudal N, Ladekarl MB, Jurgens G Adverse Events Associated with Flumazenil Treatment for the Management of Suspected Benzodiazepine Intoxication--A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses of Randomised Trials Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2016.PMID 26096314
  39. [39]Proudfoot AT, Krenzelok EP, Vale JA Position Paper on urine alkalinization J Toxicol Clin Toxicol, 2004.PMID 15083932
  40. [40]Boehnert MT, Lovejoy FH Value of the QRS duration versus the serum drug level in predicting seizures and ventricular arrhythmias after an acute overdose of tricyclic antidepressants N Engl J Med, 1985.PMID 4022081
  41. [41]Krenz JR, Kaakeh Y An Overview of Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Therapy in Calcium Channel Blocker and beta-blocker Overdose Pharmacotherapy, 2018.PMID 30141827
  42. [42]Gosselin S, Hoegberg LCG, Hoffman RS, et al. Evidence-based recommendations on the use of intravenous lipid emulsion therapy in poisoning Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2016.PMID 27608281
  43. [43]Calello DP, Liu KD, Wiegand TJ, et al. Extracorporeal Treatment for Metformin Poisoning: Systematic Review and Recommendations From the Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning Workgroup Crit Care Med, 2015.PMID 25860205
  44. [44]Ghannoum M, Gosselin S, Hoffman RS, et al. Extracorporeal treatment for ethylene glycol poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup Crit Care, 2023.PMID 36765419
  45. [45]Kim HK, Nelson LS Reversal of Opioid-Induced Ventilatory Depression Using Low-Dose Naloxone (0.04 mg): a Case Series J Med Toxicol, 2016.PMID 26289651
  46. [46]Isbister GK, Buckley NA, Whyte IM Serotonin toxicity: a practical approach to diagnosis and treatment Med J Aust, 2007.PMID 17874986
  47. [47]Rosenberg J, Benowitz NL, Pond S Pharmacokinetics of drug overdose. Clin Pharmacokinet, 1981.PMID 7016383
  48. [48]Sue YJ, Shannon M Pharmacokinetics of drugs in overdose. Clin Pharmacokinet, 1992.PMID 1511533
  49. [49]Hoegberg LCG, Gosselin S, Buckley NA, et al. Recommendations from the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative on the administration of activated charcoal in acute oral overdose. Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2026.PMID 41906697
  50. [50]Cao D, Arens AM, Chow SL, et al. Part 10: Adult and Pediatric Special Circumstances of Resuscitation: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation, 2025.PMID 41122889
  51. [51]Freund Y, Viglino D, Cachanado M, et al. Effect of Noninvasive Airway Management of Comatose Patients With Acute Poisoning: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA, 2023.PMID 38019968
  52. [52]Zydus Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. FOMEPIZOLE injection, solution DailyMed; label revised December 2024, updated November 2025, 2024.Source
  53. [53]Cumberland Pharmaceuticals Inc. ACETADOTE- acetylcysteine injection, solution DailyMed; prescribing information revised July 2025, 2025.Source
  54. [54]HF Acquisition Co LLC, DBA HealthFirst THIAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE INJECTION, SOLUTION injection, solution DailyMed; updated May 2026, 2026.Source
  55. [55]American College of Medical Toxicology Guidance document: management priorities in salicylate toxicity. J Med Toxicol, 2015.PMID 25715929
  56. [56]Rogers JP, Oldham MA, Fricchione G, et al. Evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management of catatonia: Recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol, 2023.PMID 37039129
  57. [57]Dart RC, Mullins ME, Matoushek T, et al. Management of Acetaminophen Poisoning in the US and Canada: A Consensus Statement. JAMA Netw Open, 2023.PMID 37552484
  58. [58]Beuhler MC, Feldman R, Gummin DD, et al. 2024 Annual report of the National Poison Data System® (NPDS) from America's Poison Centers(®): 42nd annual report. Clin Toxicol (Phila), 2025.PMID 41432769
  59. [59]UK Teratology Information Service Exposure to ethylene glycol in pregnancy UKTIS public summary, version 4.0, May 2026, 2026.Source
  60. [60]UK Teratology Information Service Organophosphate poisoning in pregnancy UKTIS public summary, version 3.0, August 2022, 2022.Source
  61. [61]European Malignant Hyperthermia Group Recognising and managing a malignant hyperthermia crisis (v2024) EMHG, 4 November 2024, 2024.Source
  62. [62]US Environmental Protection Agency Health Effects Notebook Glossary EPA; updated 6 November 2025, 2025.Source
  63. [63]US Environmental Protection Agency Conducting a Human Health Risk Assessment EPA; updated 13 January 2026, 2026.Source
  64. [64]Grogan S, Preuss CV Pharmacokinetics. StatPearls; chapter updated July 2023, 2026 book edition, 2026.PMID 32491676
  65. [65]Horde GW, Gupta V Drug Clearance. StatPearls; chapter updated June 2023, 2026 book edition, 2026.PMID 32491690
  66. [66]National Library of Medicine Poisoning MedlinePlus; page metadata updated July 2018, 2018.Source
  67. [67]Schabelman E, Kuo D Glucose before thiamine for Wernicke encephalopathy: a literature review. J Emerg Med, 2012.PMID 22104258
  68. [68]BTG Specialty Pharmaceuticals DIGIFAB- ovine digoxin immune fab injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution DailyMed, 2025.Source
  69. [69]SERB SA CYANOKIT- hydroxocobalamin injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution DailyMed, 2025.Source
  70. [70]Proveblue Ltd PROVAYBLUE- methylene blue injection DailyMed, 2025.Source
  71. [71]World Health Organization WHO guideline for clinical management of exposure to lead — chelating agents WHO guideline, 2021, 2021.Source
Poisoning Overview & Toxidromes · NeetVellum