Endocrinology · General Medicine

Osteoporosis

Also known as Osteoporosis · Low bone mass · Fragility fractures · Silent bone disease

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease of low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, increasing the risk of fragility fractures (hip, spine, wrist). Diagnosis is by DEXA T-score of minus 2.5 or less (osteopenia minus 1 to minus 2.5; a fragility fracture establishes the diagnosis regardless of score), and the FRAX score estimates 10-year fracture risk to guide treatment. Risk factors include age, female sex, postmenopausal status, family history, low BMI, glucocorticoids, smoking, hypogonadism and hyperthyroidism. It is often silent until a fracture. Management is lifestyle (weight-bearing exercise, no smoking, calcium and vitamin D) plus first-line bisphosphonates (alendronate, zoledronate), with denosumab and anabolic teriparatide for high-risk or refractory disease. After 3 to 5 years of a bisphosphonate, a drug holiday is considered. The goal is preventing the first fragility fracture, especially hip and vertebral, which carry high morbidity and mortality.

High yieldHigh evidenceUpdated 26 July 202626 min readVerification in progress

Practise this topic

Plate IFigure from this chapter
On this page
Study tools

Exam tags

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLAB

Red flags

  • Low-trauma fracture (fragility fracture) at any age — osteoporosis established; investigate and treat
  • Vertebral fracture with loss of height or kyphosis — osteoporotic fracture; DEXA and treatment
  • Long-term glucocorticoid therapy — high osteoporosis risk; prophylactic bone protection
  • Rising bone turnover or falling DEXA T-score on treatment — treatment failure or non-adherence
  • Atypical femoral fracture or osteonecrosis of the jaw on long-term bisphosphonate — drug holiday

Meet the patient

A 72-year-old woman is admitted after slipping on a wet bathroom mat and landing on her hip — she cannot weight-bear, and the X-ray shows an intertrochanteric fracture. She had a wrist fracture at 64 that was "just plastered", takes no bone medication, and has lost five centimetres of height over the last decade. Her bloods come back normal: calcium 2.38, phosphate 1.1, ALP 95.[1][5]

The single question that must be answered before she leaves hospital is the question that defines this whole disease: has anyone ever measured her bone, and is she on a bisphosphonate yet? The wrist fracture eight years ago was her first warning, missed. Everything below exists to make sure the second fracture never happens — and the single zoledronate infusion given within 90 days of this hip repair is the intervention that will cut her mortality by 28 percent.[1][5]

What osteoporosis actually is — porous bone, the T-score, and the fracture that trumps the number

Osteoporosis is the most common metabolic bone disease, and its entire clinical importance is its fractures — the bone itself is painless until it breaks. It is a progressive systemic skeletal disorder of low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration that raises bone fragility and fracture risk; the fractures cluster at the hip, vertebrae and distal forearm, and they carry major morbidity, mortality and cost, especially in older adults. So management is preventive end to end: find high-risk bone early with DEXA and FRAX, treat it, and stop the next fracture before it starts.[1]

The operational WHO threshold is the DEXA T-score — the number of standard deviations the patient's bone mineral density sits below the young-adult healthy mean. Osteoporosis is a T-score of minus 2.5 or less at the femoral neck, total hip or lumbar spine; osteopenia is minus 1.0 to minus 2.5; normal is minus 1.0 or higher. Premenopausal women and men under 50 use the Z-score (age- and sex-matched) instead. The threshold examiners love to probe is the override clause: a low-trauma fracture of the hip or spine establishes osteoporosis regardless of the T-score — so a patient in the osteopenic band who has already fractured is treated as having the disease, not watched.[1][2]

The consultant confession: I have seen too many patients told their DEXA was "only osteopenic, come back in two years" — having already fractured. The T-score is a probability tool, not a gatekeeper. The fracture is the disease.[1]

The other defining feature is biochemical silence. In osteoporosis the serum calcium, phosphate and alkaline phosphatase are normal — and that one fact does more differential-diagnosis work than any scan. A raised calcium means malignancy or hyperparathyroidism; a raised ALP means osteomalacia, Paget or malignancy; a low calcium means osteomalacia or vitamin D deficiency. Normal across the board, plus a fragility fracture, is osteoporosis until proven otherwise.[1]

FigureDiagnosis (DEXA) — T-score minus 2.5 or less; minus 1.0 to minus 2.5 is osteopenia; a fragility fracture is established disease whatever the score; FRAX gives the 10-year probability. Risk factors — age, female sex, postmenopause, family history, low BMI, glucocorticoids, smoking, hypogonadism, hyperthyroidism. The disease is silent until a hip, spine or wrist gives way.

Two axes classify it, and only one is useful at the bedside. The historical pathophysiological split separates type 1 (postmenopausal) — oestrogen-driven, high-turnover, trabecular, vertebral and wrist fractures in women aged 50 to 70 — from type 2 (senile) — low-turnover, cortical and trabecular, hip and pelvic fractures in men and women over 70. The axis that actually changes management is primary versus secondary: roughly half of women and the majority of men with a fragility fracture have an identifiable secondary driver, so a structured hunt is mandatory in every new diagnosis.[1]

Type 1 (postmenopausal)

oestrogen deficiency

  • Women, age 50 to 70
  • High-turnover, osteoclast-driven
  • Accelerated trabecular loss
  • Vertebral and distal-radial fractures

Type 2 (senile)

ageing

  • Men and women over 70
  • Low-turnover, fewer osteoblasts
  • Cortical and trabecular loss
  • Hip, pelvic and proximal fractures

Secondary

an identifiable cause

  • Glucocorticoids, hypogonadism
  • Hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism
  • Malabsorption, CKD, RA
  • Most men and many younger women
[1]

How common, who breaks, and where to cast the net

Osteoporosis is silent, common, and astonishingly asymmetric across sex. An estimated 200 million people live with it worldwide — an osteoporotic fracture happens roughly every 3 seconds — and the lifetime risk after 50 is about one in three women and one in five men. Hip-fracture incidence climbs exponentially in women after 50 and in men after 70, and as populations age the global burden is projected to roughly double.[1]

Osteoporosis — the numbers that matter

200Maffected worldwidemost common metabolic bone disease
1 in 3women over 50lifetime fragility-fracture risk
1 in 5men over 50lifetime fragility-fracture risk
20 to 30%hip-fracture 1-yr mortalitymajor loss of independence
2xrisk after a prior fracturea fracture predicts the next
[1]

The burden lands hardest on the hip. Of an estimated 9 million osteoporotic fractures a year, about 1.6 million are hip fractures, projected to rise sharply as Asia ages. Hip fracture consumes a major share of every developed health system's orthopaedic and rehabilitation budget, and the loss of independence afterwards is the single largest driver of new nursing-home admissions in older women. Women dominate the postmenopausal cohort, but men die more often after a hip fracture — partly because the diagnosis is never made and no bone therapy is ever started.[1]

Risk factors split into fixed and modifiable or iatrogenic, and the modifiable list is the one an examiner wants verbatim. Fixed: age, female sex, menopause, parental history of hip fracture, low body mass index, and white or Asian ethnicity. The actionable, secondary drivers are the list to reel off: oral glucocorticoids, hypogonadism (premature menopause, anti-androgen therapy, hyperprolactinaemia), hyperthyroidism, primary hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease, malabsorption (coeliac, post-gastrectomy, bariatric), chronic liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, low calcium and vitamin D, immobility, and low BMI.[1][2]

Why bone breaks — RANKL, OPG, and the oestrogen that holds the brake

Bone is not inert — it is continually remodelled, and osteoporosis is a remodelling imbalance where resorption outruns formation. Two cell lineages do the work in coupled basic multicellular units: osteoclasts (multinucleated, haematopoietic-derived) resorb old bone, and osteoblasts (mesenchymal-derived) lay down new osteoid that then mineralises. Over any cycle in osteoporosis, resorption exceeds formation, the net balance is negative, trabeculae thin and perforate, cortex becomes porous, and bone strength — which depends on density and quality (architecture, mineralisation, microdamage) — falls until a minor load snaps it.[1]

FigureHealthy lattice, then remodelling imbalance, then fragile bone. Oestrogen deficiency, ageing and glucocorticoids tip the balance so osteoclast resorption beats osteoblast formation through the RANKL-to-OPG axis. Trabeculae thin, perforate and disconnect; cortex goes porous. Serum calcium, phosphate and ALP stay normal.

Etymology for viva gold: osteo is Greek for "bone", poros for "passage" or "pore" — osteoporosis is literally "porous bone". Drop that and the examiner knows you have read past the headline.[1]

The molecular control of the balance is the RANK / RANKL / OPG axis, and it is the single most examinable pathway in bone. RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand), expressed by osteoblasts and stromal cells, binds RANK on the osteoclast precursor and drives its differentiation, activation and survival. The decoy receptor osteoprotegerin (OPG), also made by osteoblasts, mops up RANKL and blocks it, braking resorption. After the menopause, oestrogen deficiency removes the brake: RANKL and the pro-resorptive cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha) rise while OPG falls, osteoclasts are recruited in droves, and resorption accelerates — producing high-turnover, type 1 (postmenopausal) osteoporosis with selective trabecular loss.[1]

A remodelling cycle runs a fixed sequence — activation, resorption, reversal, formation, mineralisation, resting — normally ending in balanced repair. The conductor is the osteocyte, the most abundant and long-lived cell in bone, exquisitely mechanosensitive through its lacuno-canalicular network: load it and it promotes formation; unload it (immobility, paralysis, weightlessness) and it signals for resorption. The molecular link from sensing to building is Wnt signalling, which osteocytes restrain by secreting sclerostin (SOST) and Dickkopf-1. Ageing raises sclerostin, osteoblast formation declines, osteocytes senesce and die, and each cycle underfills its resorption cavity — the lesion of low-turnover, type 2 (senile) osteoporosis and the hip and pelvic fractures of advanced age.[1]

The same final common pathway is amplified by every secondary driver. Glucocorticoids suppress osteoblast and osteocyte survival and raise resorption; hyperthyroidism and excess thyroid replacement accelerate turnover; hyperparathyroidism drives osteoclast-mediated resorption directly; hypogonadism removes the same oestrogen or testosterone brake as the menopause; immobility unloads the osteocyte. Knowing the axis is knowing the drugs: bisphosphonates and denosumab both blunt resorption, while teriparatide and romosozumab push the formation side.[1]

Denosumab — the pathway in one drug

Fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL (antiresorptive)

Dose

60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months

[6] [20]

The silent disease — how the patient actually looks

Osteoporosis produces no symptoms until bone breaks — and the break is almost always from a trivial fall. Many patients are flagged first by a DEXA done for risk factors; far too many are flagged only by the first fracture. The presentations cluster into three patterns, sometimes with the chronic deformity of accumulated vertebral collapse.[1]

Vertebral (fragility) fractures are the commonest. About two-thirds are clinically silent and are found incidentally on chest or abdominal imaging; the rest present with acute or subacute mid- to lower-thoracic and upper-lumbar back pain after minimal or no trauma — often just bending, lifting or coughing — that is local and mechanical, eased by rest and worse sitting forward. Multiple wedge compressions shorten and angulate the spine: loss of height over 4 cm, a progressive thoracic kyphosis (the dowager's hump), a protuberant abdomen where the rib margin meets the pelvic brim, and in severe cases a restrictive ventilatory defect. A painful vertebral fracture is managed with stepped analgesia, early mobilisation, and — for persistent severe pain — percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.[1]

Hip fractures present after a fall from standing height with groin pain, an externally rotated and shortened leg, and inability to weight-bear — a surgical emergency under a combined orthogeriatric model (see below). Distal forearm (Colles) fractures classically follow a fall onto an outstretched hand in a postmenopausal woman — the median age is younger than for hip fracture, and it is often the first hint that the skeleton is failing.[1]

UK|GLOBAL

Atypical presentation in the elderly and frail. Pain response is blunted, so a vertebral fracture may surface only as "I have shrunk" or new difficulty reaching shelves; a hip fracture in a cognitively impaired patient may show as a fall with refusal to walk rather than classic limb deformity. Always palpate the spine, measure standing height, and image the hip in any non-weight-bearing faller — the absence of severe pain does not exclude a fracture.

[1]

The unifying clue across all of them is low-energy trauma — a fall from standing height or less, or a force that would not break a healthy bone. Any fracture sustained in such circumstances, at any age, establishes osteoporosis until proven otherwise and triggers the work-up below.[1]

Split the mimics — the differential face-off

The decisive discriminator is almost always a biochemical or radiological abnormality that osteoporosis lacks. Because osteoporosis is biochemically silent and presents with fracture or low density, the differential is the set of conditions that also produce bone pain, fracture or low bone mass:[1]

ConditionDiscriminating feature vs osteoporosis
**Osteomalacia** (vitamin D deficiency)Diffuse bone pain, proximal myopathy, **low or low-normal calcium**, **raised ALP**, low 25-OH vitamin D; looser zones on X-ray
**Primary hyperparathyroidism****Raised (or high-normal) calcium**, **raised or inappropriately normal PTH**, raised ALP; subperiosteal resorption, renal stones
**Multiple myeloma**Same age group; **anaemia, renal impairment, hypercalcaemia**; monoclonal band on serum/urine electrophoresis; lytic punched-out lesions
**Metastatic bone disease**Focal or progressive pain, history of **breast, prostate or lung cancer**; sclerotic or lytic lesions; raised ALP
**Paget disease****Markedly raised ALP**, normal calcium; thickened warm bones, hearing loss, skull enlargement; mosaic lamellar bone on histology
**Secondary osteoporosis**Identifiable cause: glucocorticoids, hypogonadism, thyrotoxicosis, malabsorption, CKD; treat the underlying driver
**Transient regional osteoporosis / CRPS**Focal, painful regional bone loss (often hip or ankle); self-limiting, marrow oedema on MRI
[1]

The one-line discriminator beneath: in osteoporosis the serum calcium, phosphate and ALP are normal; raised calcium is malignancy or hyperparathyroidism; raised ALP is osteomalacia, Paget or malignancy; low calcium is osteomalacia or vitamin D deficiency. And always think myeloma in any older patient with a fragility fracture — check the full blood count, renal function, calcium, and serum and urine protein electrophoresis.[1]

The bedside round — height, hips, and the secondary-cause hunt

Bedside assessment rarely makes the diagnosis; it confirms the fracture pattern, sizes up fall risk, and hunts the secondary driver. Three aims, in this order:[1][2]

  • Measure height every visit. Loss of more than 4 cm from the young-adult peak is a sensitive trigger to image the thoracolumbar spine for occult vertebral fractures.
  • Weigh and calculate BMI. A BMI under 21 to 22 is an independent risk factor and a FRAX input.
  • Examine for kyphosis (wall-to-occiput gap), proximal muscle weakness (a proximal myopathy whispers osteomalacia, not osteoporosis), and focal spinal tenderness (vertebral fracture — or, if constant and progressive, malignancy).
  • Screen the secondary drivers at the bedside — thyrotoxicosis or hypothyroidism, Cushing syndrome (striae, bruising, central obesity, proximal myopathy), hypogonadism in men (loss of secondary sexual hair, small testes), and chronic liver or renal disease.[1][2]

A prior fragility fracture is at once the strongest risk factor and a diagnostic event — examine for old fractures at the wrist, hip, spine, proximal humerus and pelvis, and corroborate with prior imaging. The patient who has already fractured is the one most likely to fracture again, which is why the highest-yield intervention in the field is finding her.[1]

DEXA, FRAX and the secondary hunt — the fixed diagnostic ladder

Investigation answers four questions: how dense is the bone, what is the absolute fracture risk, is there an occult vertebral fracture, and is there a secondary cause? Run them as a set.[2]

DEXA of the lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck is the gold standard, reported as the T-score (standard deviations below the young-adult mean) in adults over 50 and the Z-score (age- and sex-matched) in premenopausal women and men under 50. The WHO thresholds, reproduced exactly: osteoporosis equals minus 2.5 or less; osteopenia equals minus 1.0 to minus 2.5; normal equals minus 1.0 or higher; severe (established) osteoporosis equals minus 2.5 or less plus a fragility fracture. DEXA is reported per-site because arthritis, aortic calcification or an existing vertebral fracture can artefactually raise the spine reading, so use the lowest of femoral neck, total hip and spine.[1]

DEXA T-score criteria (WHO operational thresholds)

T minus 1.0 or higherNormalBMD within 1 SD of young-adult mean
T minus 1.0 to minus 2.5Osteopenialow bone mass; treat if FRAX high
T minus 2.5 or lessOsteoporosistreat
T minus 2.5 or less plus fractureSevereestablished osteoporosis
[2]

FRAX turns the risk factors into a 10-year fracture probability. It integrates age, sex, BMI, prior fragility fracture, parental hip fracture, current smoking, glucocorticoid use, rheumatoid arthritis, secondary causes, and alcohol 3 or more units daily — with or without femoral-neck BMD — into the 10-year probability of hip fracture and of a major osteoporotic fracture (clinical spine, hip, forearm, proximal humerus). FRAX earns its keep in the osteopenic range, where it decides who to treat, and it is calibrated to national epidemiology. Remember its blind spot: it takes yes/no inputs and does not accumulate dose, so it underestimates risk in heavy smokers, high-dose steroids and the very-high-risk patient.[10][2]

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) runs on the DEXA machine at the time of BMD, or as a lateral thoracolumbar spine X-ray, to catch the morphometric vertebral fractures that are clinically silent but, once present, establish the diagnosis and independently raise future fracture risk. Indications: height loss over 4 cm, historical height loss over 6 cm, recent non-traumatic back pain, and osteopenia with age over 70 in women or 80 in men.[2]

Screen for a secondary cause in every new diagnosis — the panel that pays for itself: full blood count and ESR, serum calcium, phosphate, albumin and ALP, renal and liver function, TSH, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, and serum testosterone in men. Add when the picture demands it: intact PTH, 24-hour urinary calcium (hypercalciuria or malabsorption), serum and urine protein electrophoresis with serum free light chains (myeloma), coeliac serology (tissue transglutaminase IgA) in unexplained or low-BMI disease, a morning cortisol or overnight dexamethasone suppression (Cushing), gonadotrophins (FSH, LH) to characterise hypogonadism, and bone turnover markers (CTX, P1NP) as a baseline and adherence check. Bone biopsy is reserved for atypical presentation or suspected osteomalacia.[1][2]

One caveat worth stating: plain X-rays confirm a fracture but do not measure density. Bone must lose roughly 30 to 40 percent of its mineral content before osteopenia is visible radiographically — so a normal-looking film never excludes osteoporosis. DEXA is required.[1]

Acute fracture is a surgical event, not a medical one

Figure1 Lifestyle and supplements — balance-and-strength exercise, no smoking, fall prevention, adequate calcium and vitamin D. 2 First-line bisphosphonate — alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate. 3 Alternatives — denosumab (RANKL antibody); anabolic teriparatide or romosozumab for severe disease. 4 Drug holiday and review at 3 to 5 years. Never stop denosumab without a transition antiresorptive.
[1]

There is no resuscitation for osteoporosis itself — but an acute fragility fracture is a time-critical surgical and orthogeriatric event, and the medical team's job is to start bone therapy before discharge.[1][5]

Acute hip fracture is a surgical emergency managed best under a combined orthogeriatric model: prompt work-up, early surgery, early mobilisation, and prompt osteoporosis therapy before discharge. Delay is lethal: in a UK regional audit of over 5000 patients, surgical delay beyond 36 hours for logistical (non-medical) reasons increased one-year mortality by 20 percent — which is why national hip-fracture audits track time-to-theatre. The single intervention that changes outcome after repair is zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously within 90 days of surgical repair, which cut further clinical fractures by 35 percent and all-cause mortality by 28 percent in the HORIZON recurrent-fracture trial. Acute painful vertebral fracture is managed with stepped analgesia, early mobilisation, brief external support, and vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for persistent severe pain.[5][23]

The stepwise drug ladder — lifestyle, bisphosphonate, then the heavy artillery

Definitive management is a stepwise ladder: universal lifestyle and supplements for everyone, a first-line bisphosphonate for most, then denosumab or an anabolic for severe disease, then a drug-holiday review.[1][2]

Step 1 — the universal baseline. Exercise that challenges balance and strength prevents falls: the Cochrane synthesis of 108 randomised trials found exercise reduced the rate of falls by 23 percent in community-dwelling older people — so prescribe weight-bearing and resistance activity plus a structured fall-prevention programme (home-hazard reduction, balance training, vision correction, medication review, as distilled from the NICE falls guideline). Add smoking cessation and limit alcohol. Ensure adequate calcium (about 1000 to 1200 mg a day, diet first) and vitamin D, correcting deficiency before starting an antiresorptive — but calcium and vitamin D alone are adjuncts, not substitutes, for specific therapy in established disease.[1][2][21][22]

Step 2 — first-line bisphosphonate. For osteoporosis, or osteopenia plus a FRAX over threshold, start a bisphosphonate: synthetic pyrophosphate analogues that bind hydroxyapatite and cripple osteoclast function and survival. In the Fracture Intervention Trial, alendronate cut new morphometric vertebral fractures by 47 percent (and hip fracture by 51 percent) in women with existing vertebral fractures; risedronate cut vertebral fractures by 41 percent over 3 years (VERT) and hip fracture by 30 percent in elderly women with confirmed osteoporosis (HIP); zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously over at least 15 minutes once yearly is preferred when adherence or upper-gastrointestinal tolerability is the issue, in acute fracture, or for patients who prefer intermittent dosing. Counsel alendronate takers to take it fasting with water and stay upright for at least 30 minutes.[3][4][11][12][13]

Bisphosphonates — the first-line ladder

Antiresorptive; impair osteoclast function

Dose

Alendronate 70 mg PO weekly; risedronate 35 mg PO weekly; zoledronic acid 5 mg IV annually; ibandronate 150 mg PO monthly

[3] [4] [11] [12] [13]

Step 3 — denosumab and the anabolics. Denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months reduced vertebral fracture by 68 percent, hip by 40 percent and nonvertebral by 20 percent over 3 years (FREEDOM) and suits patients who prefer twice-yearly dosing; it is not renally cleared, and hypocalcaemia risk rises as kidney function falls (eGFR under 15), so monitor calcium in advanced CKD — but it must never be stopped without a transition antiresorptive, because withdrawal causes a rebound in bone turnover above baseline and a cluster of multiple vertebral fractures within months. The anabolics — teriparatide (PTH 1-34) 20 micrograms subcutaneously daily (65 percent fewer new vertebral fractures vs placebo) and abaloparatide 80 micrograms daily (fewer new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over 18 months in ACTIVE) — stimulate osteoblasts and build new bone; they are reserved for severe or very-high-risk disease, with treatment duration limited to about 2 years before an antiresorptive lock-in.[1][6][7][20][26][29]

Step 4 — the older agents. Raloxifene 60 mg daily, a SERM, cut new vertebral fractures by about 30 to 50 percent in the MORE trial but did not significantly reduce nonvertebral fracture; it also reduced invasive (estrogen-receptor-positive) breast cancer, at the price of more venous thromboembolism (RUTH) and hot flushes. Hormone therapy reduces total and hip fractures (WHI: total fractures down 24 percent over 5.6 years), but because the global index showed no net benefit it is now reserved for menopausal symptom control in younger postmenopausal women at the lowest dose for the shortest time. Calcitonin is a weak antiresorptive; the PROOF trial's 200 IU intranasal dose reduced vertebral fracture by about one-third (RR 0.67) while other doses failed, so its main remaining use is short-term analgesia in acute painful vertebral fracture.[14][15][16][17]

Step 5 — the drug holiday. After 3 to 5 years of an oral bisphosphonate (or 3 years of IV zoledronate), reassess. In a stable, lower-risk patient with a T-score above minus 2.5 and no recent fractures, a 2 to 3 year holiday exploits the drug's prolonged skeletal retention while trimming the rare risks of atypical femoral fracture and osteonecrosis of the jaw. In a high-risk patient (T-score below minus 2.5, prior hip or spine fracture, or fracturing on therapy) treatment continues — up to 10 years has a favourable benefit-to-risk profile. The holiday is monitored with DEXA and turnover markers, and therapy resumes if risk rises, density falls, or a fracture occurs. A drug holiday applies only to bisphosphonates — never to denosumab.[1][2]

Treatment thresholds — who gets a drug?

  1. 1

    Established osteoporosis

    T-score minus 2.5 or less; OR a fragility fracture (hip, spine) at any T-score. Treat.

  2. 2

    High risk by FRAX

    Risk algorithms combining clinical risk factors with bone mineral density identify who benefits from treatment — the FRAX-derived 10-year probability drives the decision in osteopenia.

  3. 3

    Glucocorticoid-induced

    Any adult starting or continuing glucocorticoids for 3 months or more is assessed for fracture risk; moderate-to-high risk gets calcium and vitamin D plus an osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonate preferred). At high doses (over 7.5 mg prednisolone daily) FRAX probabilities are revised upward about 15 percent.

  4. 4

    Very high risk

    Multiple or recent fractures, very low T-score, or fracture on therapy. Use anabolic-first sequencing (teriparatide or romosozumab), then an antiresorptive.

[2] [10] [18] [19]

Glucocorticoids, men, and the build-then-lock patients

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is the commonest secondary osteoporosis and the most rapidly destructive — bone loss is fastest in the first months of therapy. The 2017 American College of Rheumatology guideline says every adult starting or continuing glucocorticoids for 3 months or more should have fracture risk assessed: adults at moderate-to-high risk get calcium and vitamin D plus an additional osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonate preferred), with reassessment every year while treatment continues. FRAX already takes glucocorticoid exposure as a dichotomous input but ignores dose, so adjust it: at high doses (over 7.5 mg prednisolone daily) fracture probabilities can be revised upward by about 15 percent, while low doses (under 2.5 mg) revise them down.[18][19]

Male osteoporosis is under-recognised, and that under-recognition kills. About one in five men over 50 will fracture, and secondary causes turn up in roughly half to two-thirds of men with a fragility fracture — most often hypogonadism, steroid therapy (including for COPD and inflammatory disease), alcohol excess, smoking and hyperthyroidism. Always measure serum testosterone with LH and FSH in any man with low bone mass; testosterone replacement treats the hypogonadism and lifts BMD. Bisphosphonates and denosumab are first-line in men, teriparatide for severe disease.[1]

Post-fracture secondary prevention lives in the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). Every patient over 50 presenting with a fragility fracture is identified, investigated (DEXA, secondary-cause screen) and started on therapy. The Cochrane-style meta-analysis of 74 controlled studies found FLS care raised BMD testing by 24 percentage points, treatment initiation by 20, and adherence by 22 — and cut re-fracture risk and mortality versus usual care, which makes FLS coverage the single most effective intervention to close the treatment gap.[1][24]

Very-high-risk patients get anabolic first, then a lock. Patients with multiple or recent fractures, a T-score below minus 3.0 or minus 3.5, or a fracture sustained while on antiresorptive therapy are candidates for an anabolic agent first (teriparatide, abaloparatide or romosozumab), followed by a potent antiresorptive to lock in the gain. This build-then-lock sequence delivers larger BMD gains and fewer fractures than starting with an antiresorptive in this group — which is why romosozumab exists.[8][9]

Transplant and cancer-therapy bone loss is anticipatory. Patients about to start androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, aromatase-inhibitor therapy for breast cancer, or solid-organ or stem-cell transplantation face rapid, predictable bone loss within the first year. Measure a baseline DEXA, start calcium and vitamin D, and initiate a bisphosphonate (or denosumab) before or at the start of the gonadotropin-releasing-hormone agonist, aromatase inhibitor, or transplant immunosuppression — not after the bone is lost.[1]

The traps that harm patients — read this twice

Most preventable osteoporosis harm is a timing error — treating too late, stopping the wrong drug, or forgetting that a fracture already is the diagnosis.[1][2]

  • Waiting for the T-score to cross minus 2.5 before treating a patient who has already fractured. A fragility fracture establishes the disease whatever the score; treating the next fracture, not the last, is the whole point — and FLS programmes that close this gap cut re-fracture risk and mortality.[1][24]
  • Stopping denosumab without a transition antiresorptive. Withdrawal triggers a rebound of bone turnover above baseline and multiple vertebral fractures can cluster within months; the ECTS position is to start alternative antiresorptive therapy about 6 months after the final denosumab injection.[20]
  • Forgetting prophylaxis on long-term glucocorticoids. Anyone starting or continuing glucocorticoids for 3 months or more earns a fracture-risk assessment; at moderate-to-high risk that means calcium and vitamin D plus an osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonate preferred), and high-dose steroid exposure revises FRAX probabilities upward about 15 percent.[18][19]
  • Misreading the biochemistry. A raised calcium or ALP in a "fragility fracture" patient is not osteoporosis — it is hyperparathyroidism, myeloma, osteomalacia or Paget disease, and the treatment is entirely different.
  • Leaving a hip-fracture patient on no bone therapy at discharge. A single zoledronate infusion within 90 days of repair cuts mortality by 28 percent; omitting it is a measurable, preventable death.[5]
[20]

Complications, prognosis — and the 28 percent that decides a hip-fracture service

The disease's complications are the fractures themselves; the drug's complications are the rare ones you must name. Trial-proven therapy drops vertebral fracture by roughly 40 to 70 percent and hip fracture by 30 to 50 percent (FIT, VERT, HIP, HORIZON PFT, FREEDOM), and a single zoledronate infusion after a hip fracture cut new clinical fractures by 35 percent and all-cause mortality by 28 percent in the recurrent-fracture trial — the justification for prompt secondary prevention.[3][4][5][6][12][13]

Hip fracture carries a one-year mortality of 20 to 30 percent, a catastrophic loss of independence (half of previously independent patients need help with activities of daily living afterwards), and a high rate of immobility complications — venous thromboembolism, pressure ulcers, pneumonia, urinary infection. Vertebral fractures cause acute and chronic back pain, kyphosis with reduced vital capacity and restrictive physiology, early satiety and weight loss from the reduced abdominal cavity, and a raised future fracture and mortality risk proportional to severity.[1]

Drug complications are exactly what an examiner probes. Long-term bisphosphonates rarely cause atypical femoral fracture — a transverse, non-comminuted subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fracture, often preceded by weeks of prodromal thigh pain — and osteonecrosis of the jaw (exposed non-healing bone, usually after dental extraction in high-dose malignancy therapy). Both are rare in osteoporosis dosing but accumulate with duration, which is the rationale for the drug holiday. Acute-phase reaction (fever, myalgia, arthralgia) hits about 10 to 15 percent after the first IV zoledronate and is self-limiting; hypocalcaemia can follow zoledronate or denosumab, so replete vitamin D first.[1][2]

Pregnancy, the frail elderly, CKD, and the diabetic paradox

Pregnancy and lactation cause a transient, reversible loss of 3 to 10 percent of bone mass; bisphosphonates are contraindicated (teratogenic, long skeletal half-life), so management is calcium, vitamin D and lifestyle, with the rare pregnancy- and lactation-associated osteoporosis referred to a specialist.[1]

The elderly and frail are the highest-risk group and benefit most from fall-prevention programmes, vitamin D supplementation (which reduces falls in the deficient), home-hazard modification and IV zoledronate to overcome adherence problems — while avoiding sedating drugs and overtreatment that causes hypotension and falls.[1]

Chronic kidney disease changes the playbook. Osteoporosis treatment is broadly similar up to CKD stage 3, but in stages 4 to 5 the evidence thins — KDIGO's framework stresses optimising mineral metabolism (phosphate, calcium, parathyroid hormone) before bone-targeted drugs, because adynamic bone disease can coexist with low bone mass and BMD alone cannot tell them apart. Denosumab is not renally cleared and is usable in advanced CKD, but its hypocalcaemia risk rises steeply as eGFR falls — population data show a substantially higher incidence of mild and severe hypocalcaemia below an eGFR of 15 mL per minute — so calcium and vitamin D are monitored closely.[25][26][27][28]

The diabetic paradox is worth a viva mark. Patients with type 2 diabetes have higher than average bone mineral density yet a paradoxically higher fracture risk, because chronic hyperglycaemia, advanced glycation end-products and altered collagen cross-linking wreck bone quality rather than quantity. DEXA and FRAX both underestimate skeletal fragility in diabetes, so use a lower threshold to treat and watch fall risk. The trabecular bone score (TBS), derivable from DEXA, helps capture the hidden risk.[1]

The trials that built the ladder

Modern osteoporosis therapy rests on a sequence of large placebo-controlled RCTs, each of which earned a drug its place on the ladder.[3][4][6][7]

Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) — alendronate

Lancet, 1996

1996

RCT of 2027 postmenopausal women with low BMD and an existing vertebral fracture, alendronate vs placebo over 3 years.

Key finding

Alendronate reduced new morphometric vertebral fractures by 47% (RR 0.53), clinical vertebral fractures by 55%, and hip fracture by 51%.

Practice change

Established alendronate as a fracture-preventing therapy for established postmenopausal osteoporosis.

[3]

Fracture Intervention Trial 2 — alendronate without vertebral fractures

JAMA, 1998

1998

RCT of 4432 older women with low femoral-neck BMD but no vertebral fracture, alendronate (5 mg daily for 2 years, then 10 mg) vs placebo over about 4 years.

Key finding

In the osteoporotic subgroup (femoral-neck T-score below minus 2.5), clinical fractures fell by 36% and radiographic vertebral fractures by 44%; no significant reduction in women with higher BMD.

Practice change

Defined BMD-based treatment thresholds — antifracture benefit concentrates in women who are actually osteoporotic.

[11]

HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial — zoledronic acid

N Engl J Med, 2007

2007

RCT of 7765 postmenopausal women, once-yearly IV zoledronic acid 5 mg vs placebo over 3 years.

Key finding

Reduced morphometric vertebral fracture by 70%, hip fracture by 41%, and nonvertebral fracture by 25%; serious atrial fibrillation was more frequent.

Practice change

Made once-yearly IV zoledronate an option for osteoporosis where adherence or oral tolerability is an issue.

[4]

HORIZON Recurrent Fracture Trial — zoledronate after hip fracture

N Engl J Med, 2007

2007

RCT of 1065 patients given zoledronic acid within 90 days of surgical repair of a hip fracture vs placebo.

Key finding

Reduced new clinical fracture by 35% and all-cause mortality by 28%.

Practice change

Mandated early zoledronate in secondary prevention after hip fracture and underpinned modern Fracture Liaison Services.

[5]

FREEDOM — denosumab

N Engl J Med, 2009

2009

RCT of 7868 women with T-score minus 2.5 to minus 4.0, denosumab 60 mg SC 6-monthly vs placebo over 3 years.

Key finding

Reduced vertebral fracture by 68%, hip fracture by 40%, and nonvertebral fracture by 20%.

Practice change

Established denosumab 60 mg SC every 6 months as an antiresorptive option with proven vertebral, hip and nonvertebral fracture reduction.

[6]

Neer et al — teriparatide (PTH 1-34)

N Engl J Med, 2001

2001

RCT of 1637 postmenopausal women with prior vertebral fracture, PTH 1-34 (20 or 40 micrograms) vs placebo.

Key finding

20-microgram daily dose reduced new vertebral fracture by 65% and nonvertebral fracture by 53%; lumbar BMD rose 9 to 13%.

Practice change

Introduced anabolic therapy for severe osteoporosis, with a 2-year lifetime limit.

[7]

FRAME and ARCH — romosozumab

N Engl J Med, 2016 and 2017

2017

FRAME: romosozumab 210 mg monthly vs placebo for 12 months then denosumab. ARCH: romosozumab vs alendronate in very-high-risk women.

Key finding

FRAME: 73% lower vertebral fracture risk at 1 year. ARCH: 48% lower vertebral and 38% lower hip fracture vs alendronate, but more positively-adjudicated serious cardiovascular events.

Practice change

Introduced a dual-action (anabolic plus antiresorptive) agent for severe disease, with a cardiovascular caution.

[8] [9]

US, UK, and the rest — where the thresholds diverge

Regional guideline differences are examinable and reflect different health-system economics. The FRAX algorithm itself was built on UK epidemiology.[10]

US

United States — NOF (now the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation, BHOF) and AACE/ACE 2020. Treat if T-score is minus 2.5 or less; if T-score is minus 1.0 to minus 2.5 and the 10-year hip-fracture probability is 3% or more or the 10-year major-osteoporotic-fracture probability is 20% or more; or after any prior hip or vertebral fracture. AACE/ACE 2020 also defines a very-high-risk category (recent or multiple fractures, very low T-score, fractures on therapy) for anabolic-first therapy. Alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate and denosumab are first-line.

[2]

UK

United Kingdom — NOGG (National Osteoporosis Guideline Group). Uses FRAX with age-specific intervention thresholds rather than a single fixed percentage: the threshold rises with age, and BMD is requested only when the FRAX-derived probability sits between a lower (treatment not cost-effective) and an upper (treat without BMD) assessment threshold. Recommend FRAX in women aged 50 to 65 with risk factors, all women 65 and over, and men 50 and over with risk factors. Post-hip-fracture patients are treated regardless. QFracture is an alternative UK primary-care tool.

[10]

International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and Europe — ESCEO. Treat any patient with a prior fragility fracture (hip or spine) regardless of BMD; treat osteoporosis by T-score (minus 2.5 or less); and treat osteopenia with a high FRAX (commonly cited as major-osteoporotic 20% or hip 3%, with European variations). IOF also drives the Capture the Fracture campaign standardising Fracture Liaison Services globally.

[1]

Monitoring, and prevention across a lifetime

Monitoring combines DEXA, turnover markers and an adherence check — and the commonest cause of treatment failure is that the patient never took the drug. Repeat DEXA every 1 to 2 years in high risk and up to 3 years in stable disease, and look for the least significant change — a change exceeding roughly 3 to 5 percent at the spine and 3 to 6 percent at the hip to be real. A stable or rising T-score confirms response; a falling T-score or rising turnover markers on therapy signal non-adherence (by far the commonest cause), an unrecognised secondary cause, or treatment failure, and should trigger review. Serum CTX should fall by at least one-third within 3 to 6 months of an oral bisphosphonate, or within days of IV zoledronate; a failure to fall means the drug was not taken or not absorbed.[2]

Prevention is staged across life. Build a high peak bone mass in youth (calcium, vitamin D, weight-bearing exercise; avoid smoking and excess alcohol); maintain bone through midlife; and detect and treat risk after the menopause and in older age. Population strategies — vitamin D and calcium sufficiency, physical activity, smoking and alcohol moderation, fall prevention, and Fracture Liaison Service coverage of every fragility-fracture patient — do more to reduce the fracture burden than any single drug.[1]

The mantra, and the mnemonics

Osteoporosis management — FRACTURE

FRACTURE

  • FFalls and lifestylebalance-and-strength exercise (falls down about a quarter in trials), smoking cessation, limit alcohol, fall prevention
  • RRisk assessmentDEXA T-score plus FRAX 10-year fracture probability
  • AAdequate calcium and vitamin Dcorrect deficiency before and alongside specific therapy
  • CCorrect secondary causesglucocorticoids, hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism, low vitamin D, malabsorption
  • TTreat with a bisphosphonate first-linealendronate, risedronate or zoledronic acid — each with trial-proven fracture reduction
  • UUse anabolic for severe diseaseteriparatide or romosozumab for very-high-risk, then an antiresorptive
  • RReview at 3 to 5 yearsbenefit-versus-risk stays favourable up to 10 years in high-risk patients; reassess before extending
  • EEvaluate adherence and DEXAmonitor response; never stop denosumab without a transition antiresorptive
[1] [2] [20] [21]

The mantra: A fragility fracture is osteoporosis whatever the score — bisphosphonate first, never stop denosumab without a transition.[1][6]

Ward-round test — three stems, thirty seconds each

Stem 1 — the missed warning fracture (answer)Show

A 72-year-old woman is admitted with an intertrochanteric hip fracture after a fall from standing height. She had a Colles fracture at 64 that was plastered and discharged; she takes no bone medication. Bloods: calcium 2.38, phosphate 1.1, ALP 95. Her DEXA femoral-neck T-score is minus 2.2. What is the diagnosis, and what must happen before she goes home? Model: She has established osteoporosis — the wrist fracture eight years ago already made the diagnosis regardless of the T-score, and the normal calcium, phosphate and ALP confirm it is osteoporosis, not osteomalacia, myeloma or hyperparathyroidism. Before discharge she must have early surgical repair under an orthogeriatric model (logistical delay past 36 hours raises one-year mortality by about 20 percent in UK audit data), a zoledronic acid 5 mg IV infusion within 90 days of repair (cuts further clinical fractures by 35 percent and all-cause mortality by 28 percent), a secondary-cause screen, calcium and vitamin D, and a bisphosphonate started — ideally via a Fracture Liaison Service. Waiting for the T-score to cross minus 2.5 is the preventable error that cost her this hip.[5][23][24]

Stem 2 — the glucocorticoid trap (answer)Show

A 58-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis has taken prednisolone 10 mg daily for 8 months. Her femoral-neck T-score is minus 1.8, she has never fractured, and her unadjusted FRAX 10-year hip-fracture probability is 1.8%. Does she warrant bone-protection therapy, and why? Model: Yes. Glucocorticoid exposure is itself a FRAX input, but FRAX ignores dose — and at prednisolone 10 mg daily (a high dose, over 7.5 mg) the guideline adjustment revises her fracture probabilities upward by about 15 percent, so the unadjusted 1.8 percent underestimates her true risk. More importantly, the American College of Rheumatology GIOP guideline says any adult on glucocorticoids for 3 months or more needs a fracture-risk assessment, and adults at moderate-to-high risk get calcium and vitamin D plus an osteoporosis medication (oral bisphosphonate preferred) — she is already 8 months in, in a disease whose bone loss is fastest at the start of therapy. Teriparatide is one of the options if her risk is very high or a bisphosphonate is unsuitable. Waiting for the T-score to cross minus 2.5 — or for a fracture — is the preventable error.[18][19]

Stem 3 — the denosumab withdrawal trap (answer)Show

A 68-year-old woman has been on denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously six-monthly for 4 years with a stable T-score of minus 2.6. Her GP stops it because she is tired of injections and prescribes calcium and vitamin D alone. Four months later she presents with severe back pain and imaging shows three new vertebral fractures. What happened, and what was the correct plan? Model: This is the denosumab rebound — stopping denosumab causes bone turnover to rise above pre-treatment baseline, and multiple vertebral fractures can cluster within months. Denosumab must never simply be stopped: the European Calcified Tissue Society advises starting alternative antiresorptive therapy about 6 months after the final denosumab injection (a bisphosphonate such as oral alendronate or IV zoledronate), with turnover markers helping to define the regimen — though even bridging only partially blunts the rebound, and BMD loss or fracture can still occur. A drug holiday applies only to bisphosphonates, never to denosumab. Because she is fracturing in the rebound window she now needs prompt specialist care and likely anabolic therapy (teriparatide or romosozumab) followed by a potent antiresorptive.[20]

References29Show
  1. [1]Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis Lancet, 2019.PMID 30696576
  2. [2]Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, et al. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE Endocr Pract, 2020.PMID 32427503
  3. [3]Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, et al. Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group Lancet, 1996.PMID 8950879
  4. [4]Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, et al. Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17476007
  5. [5]Lyles KW, Colón-Emeric CS, Magaziner JS, et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture N Engl J Med, 2007.PMID 17878149
  6. [6]Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis N Engl J Med, 2009.PMID 19671655
  7. [7]Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis N Engl J Med, 2001.PMID 11346808
  8. [8]Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, et al. Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis N Engl J Med, 2016.PMID 27641143
  9. [9]Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, et al. Romosozumab or Alendronate for Fracture Prevention in Women with Osteoporosis N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 28892457
  10. [10]Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E. FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK Osteoporos Int, 2008.PMID 18292978
  11. [11]Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, et al. Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial JAMA, 1998.PMID 9875874
  12. [12]Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, et al. Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group JAMA, 1999.PMID 10527181
  13. [13]McClung MR, Geusens P, Miller PD, et al. Effect of risedronate on the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. Hip Intervention Program Study Group N Engl J Med, 2001.PMID 11172164
  14. [14]Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators JAMA, 1999.PMID 10517716
  15. [15]Barrett-Connor E, Mosca L, Collins P, et al. Effects of raloxifene on cardiovascular events and breast cancer in postmenopausal women N Engl J Med, 2006.PMID 16837676
  16. [16]Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z, et al. Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial JAMA, 2003.PMID 14519707
  17. [17]Muñoz-Torres M. Calcitonin therapy in osteoporosis Treat Endocrinol, 2004.PMID 15743107
  18. [18]Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2017.PMID 28585410
  19. [19]Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV. Guidance for the adjustment of FRAX according to the dose of glucocorticoids Osteoporos Int, 2011.PMID 21229233
  20. [20]Tsourdi E, Zillikens MC, Meier C, et al. Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2020.PMID 33103722
  21. [21]Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, et al. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019.PMID 30703272
  22. [22]Swift CG, Iliffe S Assessment and prevention of falls in older people--concise guidance Clin Med (Lond), 2014.PMID 25468853
  23. [23]Busby C, Nightingale J, Deacon C, et al. Non-medical surgical delay increases one-year mortality following hip fracture Bone Joint J, 2026.PMID 42538006
  24. [24]Wu CH, Tu ST, Chang YF, et al. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis Bone, 2018.PMID 29555309
  25. [25]Laurent MR, Dupont J, Lemahieu W, et al. Treatment of Osteoporosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2025.PMID 40457078
  26. [26]Cowan A, Jeyakumar N, McArthur E, et al. Hypocalcemia Risk of Denosumab Across the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study J Bone Miner Res, 2023.PMID 36970786
  27. [27]Ketteler M, Block GA, Evenepoel P, et al. Executive summary of the 2017 KDIGO Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) Guideline Update: what's changed and why it matters Kidney Int, 2017.PMID 28646995
  28. [28]Evenepoel P, Jørgensen HS CKD-associated osteoporosis in patients with CKD G4-5D: a pragmatic treatment approach Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2026.PMID 42566271
  29. [29]Miller PD, Hattersley G, Riis BJ, et al. Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial JAMA, 2016.PMID 27533157
Osteoporosis · NeetVellum