Gastroenterology · General Medicine
Peptic Ulcer Disease
Also known as Peptic ulcer disease · PUD · Gastric ulcer · Duodenal ulcer · H. pylori ulcer
Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) is a break in the gastric or duodenal mucosa extending through the muscularis mucosae, caused by an imbalance between aggressive acid-peptic factors and mucosal defence. The two dominant causes are Helicobacter pylori (about 95 percent of duodenal and 70 percent of gastric ulcers in Cochrane association figures) and NSAIDs/aspirin; less common are Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (gastrinoma), stress ulcers (ICU; Curling/Cushing), and malignant ulcers. It presents with epigastric burning or gnawing pain (duodenal eased by food and waking at night; gastric worsened by food) with dyspepsia; complications are bleeding (haematemesis/melaena), perforation (peritonitis, free gas), penetration, and gastric outlet obstruction. Oesophagogastroduodenosc…
On this page
Study tools
Practise this topic
Exam tags
Red flags
- Haematemesis or melaena - upper GI bleeding from an ulcer; resuscitate, IV PPI, urgent OGD
- Sudden severe epigastric pain with peritonism and free gas on imaging - perforated ulcer; emergency surgery
- Persistent vomiting and early satiety with succussion splash - gastric outlet obstruction; decompress and endoscope
- Gastric ulcer not healing after 8 to 12 weeks of PPI - biopsy to exclude gastric cancer
- Multiple, refractory or jejunal ulcers with diarrhoea - Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (gastrinoma); check fasting gastrin
Meet the patient
A 66-year-old man on long-term ibuprofen for his knees wakes at 2 a.m. with epigastric burning that is eased by a glass of milk and a couple of antacids. He has noticed the pain between meals for weeks, and his weight has crept up because eating settles it. Tonight he vomits what looks like dark coffee-grounds, then passes black tarry stool and feels faint on standing.[4][8]
Two questions are now live and they govern the next hour: is he bleeding or perforating? (the haematemesis, melaena, and postural drop say bleeding) and what caused the ulcer, so you can stop it happening again? (the NSAID plus an unasked H. pylori history). Everything below exists to answer both at consultant depth.[1][5]
What an ulcer is — and what it is not
A peptic ulcer is a break through the muscularis mucosae. Stop there; the depth is the definition. It is distinct from an erosion, which is a shallow epithelial break that heals without scarring. The distinction matters because depth decides the complication — a deep crater can sit on a visible artery (bleeding) or erode the full wall (perforation).[4]
PUD arises when aggressive factors (acid, pepsin, H. pylori, NSAIDs) overwhelm mucosal defence (the mucus-bicarbonate barrier, mucosal blood flow, prostaglandins, rapid epithelial turnover). The two dominant causes together account for the great majority of ulcers; the remainder are Zollinger-Ellison, stress ulcers in the critically ill, and malignancy.[1][4]
The clinical task is not to heal the ulcer — a PPI does that in weeks — but to find and remove the cause. After successful H. pylori eradication, duodenal-ulcer recurrence falls from 64.4 percent to 12.9 percent and gastric-ulcer recurrence from 52.4 percent to 16.3 percent versus no treatment (Cochrane; very-low-quality evidence) — acid suppression alone leaves most ulcers free to come back. That is the argument for eradication.[12]
Duodenal versus gastric — the face-off that earns the marks
The DU-GU split drives the symptoms, the cancer risk, and the follow-up — learn it as a face-off with one discriminator.[4]
Duodenal ulcer (DU)
- Site: first part of duodenum (the bulb)
- H. pylori in about 95 percent
- Acid hypersecretion — antral-predominant gastritis drives hypergastrinaemia
- Pain relieved by food and antacid; 2 to 5 h after meals; wakes at night
- Weight may increase, because eating eases the pain
- Malignancy is essentially never — biopsy for H. pylori only
- Heals with PPI 4 weeks; NO routine repeat OGD
Gastric ulcer (GU)
- Site: body or antrum (Johnson I), prepyloric (III), cardia (IV)
- H. pylori in about 70 percent
- Acid normal or low — corpus atrophic gastritis
- Pain worsened by food; nausea, early satiety, weight loss
- Weight tends to fall
- Malignancy must be excluded — BIOPSY every gastric ulcer
- Heals with PPI 6 to 8 weeks; repeat OGD at 8 to 12 weeks to confirm healing
The discriminator line: food eases duodenal pain and worsens gastric pain. Add "wakes at night" (classic DU) and "weight loss with eating" (classic GU) and you can call it at the bedside before the scope.[4]
How common, and the patient who bleeds
PUD is common — lifetime prevalence 5 to 10 percent (incidence 0.1 to 0.3 percent per year), though it has fallen as H. pylori carriage declines and acid suppression improves.[14] H. pylori infects over 43 percent of the world's population, acquired mainly by the faecal-oral and oral-oral routes; prevalence is higher in regions of low socioeconomic status and poor sanitation.[20]
The cause split examiners quote: H. pylori is associated with 95 percent of duodenal ulcers and 70 percent of gastric ulcers (Cochrane).[12] NSAIDs independently raise ulcer and bleeding risk and synergise with H. pylori (ulcer-bleed risk 1.79-fold for H. pylori, 4.85-fold for NSAIDs, 6.13-fold when both are present).[13] In controlled studies, peptic ulcer was present in 35.8 percent of NSAID takers versus 8.3 percent of controls. Most NSAID-related bleeds follow short-term use and over half (63.62 percent) have no dyspeptic warning — which is why the first sign is often a complication.[8]
Peptic ulcer disease — the numbers that decide the answer
Risk factors for an ulcer — and more importantly for a complication (bleeding, perforation): H. pylori and NSAID or aspirin use (dose-dependent and synergistic), age over 60, a prior ulcer or bleed, smoking (impairs mucosal healing), alcohol excess, and the concurrent drugs — anticoagulants, antiplatelets (clopidogrel), SSRIs, corticosteroids, spironolactone.[1]
The single most dangerous combination is an NSAID plus H. pylori in an older patient on an anticoagulant — this is the patient who arrives in resus with massive haematemesis at 3 a.m. Find them before they bleed: test and eradicate H. pylori before starting a long-term NSAID, co-prescribe a PPI, and use the lowest dose for the shortest time.[8]
Two roads to an ulcer — the mechanism an examiner probes
Normal mucosal defence rests on a mucus-bicarbonate layer (a near-neutral pH at the epithelial surface), mucosal blood flow, prostaglandins (PGE2, PGI2) that drive mucus and bicarbonate secretion, and rapid epithelial renewal. An ulcer forms when that balance tips toward acid-peptic injury — and the pathogenesis differs by site.[4]
Gastric ulcer — weak defence, often normal acid. H. pylori-induced corpus-predominant atrophic gastritis shrinks parietal cell mass and acid output, and the damaged mucosa is injured even by modest acid. NSAIDs reproduce the picture by depleting prostaglandins. The exception is Zollinger-Ellison, where a gastrinoma drives acid hypersecretion through the defence — a hyper-acid gastric ulcer.[3][4]
Duodenal ulcer — acid hypersecretion with H. pylori. The pattern is antral-predominant gastritis: somatostatin-secreting D cells are damaged, gastrin release is unchecked, and acid output rises. The excess acid reaches the duodenum, the mucosa undergoes gastric metaplasia, and H. pylori colonises that metaplastic epithelium, causing ulceration. This is why H. pylori is associated with about 95 percent of duodenal ulcers.[12][3]
H. pylori virulence — the molecules examiners name
Helicobacter pylori is a spiral, microaerophilic, urease-producing Gram-negative bacterium that lives in the gastric mucus layer. Its virulence factors are high-yield and each one maps to a clinical fact:[3]
- Urease — hydrolyses urea to ammonia, alkalinising its microenvironment and surviving gastric acid. This is the basis of the rapid urease (CLO) test and the urea breath test.
- CagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A) — injected into epithelial cells via a type IV secretion system; drives inflammation and ulcer risk, and is strongly linked to gastric adenocarcinoma. Strains carrying the cag pathogenicity island are more virulent.
- VacA (vacuolating cytotoxin A) — forms pores in epithelial membranes, induces apoptosis and vacuolation.
- BabA (blood-group antigen-binding adhesin) — binds the Lewis-b blood-group antigen on gastric epithelium, enabling tight adherence and more severe disease.[1]
NSAIDs and the rest — COX inhibition and the special ulcers
NSAIDs inhibit cyclo-oxygenase. Blockade of the constitutive COX-1 cuts mucosal prostaglandin (PGE2, PGI2) synthesis, so mucus and bicarbonate secretion fall, mucosal blood flow drops, and epithelial turnover slows — the mucosa is stripped of its defences. Weakly acidic NSAIDs (aspirin) also cause direct topical injury in an acid stomach. Selective COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib, etoricoxib) spare COX-1 and reduce — but do not abolish — gastrointestinal toxicity, at the cost of more cardiovascular risk.[4][8]
Zollinger-Ellison syndrome — a gastrin-secreting tumour (usually pancreatic or duodenal, part of MEN-1 in a quarter of cases) drives massive acid hypersecretion, producing multiple, recurrent, or distal (jejunal) ulcers refractory to standard PPI doses, with diarrhoea and a markedly raised fasting serum gastrin (check while off PPI).[4]
Stress ulcers in the critically ill arise from splanchnic hypoperfusion and mucosal ischaemia rather than acid — hence prophylaxis is targeted at the ICU patient with specific risk factors: Curling ulcer (major burns) and Cushing ulcer (severe head injury, direct vagal stimulation with massive acid and a high perforation risk).[4]
Clinical presentation — the pain, the silence, the complication
Classic symptom — epigastric burning or gnawing, episodic and periodic (clusters over days to weeks, then remits). The food relationship is the discriminator examiners test:[4]
- Duodenal ulcer — pain relieved by food (and antacids or milk), occurs 2 to 5 hours after eating, and classically wakes the patient at night (often 1 to 2 a.m.). Weight may rise because eating eases the pain.
- Gastric ulcer — pain worsened by food, soon after eating, with nausea, early satiety, and weight loss.[1]
The silence trap. Many ulcers — especially in the elderly and in NSAID users — are silent, and declare themselves as a complication: haematemesis or melaena, sudden perforation, or unexplained iron-deficiency anaemia. Over half (63.62 percent) of NSAID-related upper-GI bleeds occur with no dyspeptic warning symptoms, and most of that NSAID exposure is short-term — which is why gastroprotection must reach beyond chronic rheumatology clinics.[8]
How complications present (the way many ulcers first declare themselves):[4][5]
- Bleeding — haematemesis (vomiting blood; "coffee-ground" if altered) and/or melaena (black, tarry, foul-smelling stool); syncope and postural dizziness with significant volume loss.
- Perforation — sudden, severe, generalised abdominal pain with peritonism (rigidity, guarding, rebound, absent bowel sounds) and free gas under the diaphragm on an erect chest X-ray.
- Penetration — a posterior DU boring into the pancreas gives severe boring back pain unresponsive to antacids, with raised amylase or lipase; no free gas, so it is often missed.
- Gastric outlet obstruction — non-bilious projectile vomiting of undigested food, early satiety, a succussion splash, and visible peristalsis.[1]
Alarm features — the trigger for urgent OGD
Apply these to any patient with dyspepsia. Their presence moves the patient straight to urgent oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and away from an empirical trial of acid suppression.[1]
[23] [1]The differential — and the surgical mimics
Recurrent or acute epigastric pain is not always a peptic ulcer. The key mimics, each with a one-line discriminator:[4]
- GORD — retrosternal burning and regurgitation, worse lying down or after large meals; no ulcer on OGD.
- Functional (non-ulcer) dyspepsia — dyspepsia with a normal OGD; the commonest cause after H. pylori is excluded.
- Gastric cancer — weight loss, dysphagia, early satiety, anaemia, a palpable mass; biopsy every gastric ulcer.
- Biliary colic or cholecystitis — right-upper-quadrant pain worse after fatty food; Murphy sign.
- Acute pancreatitis — severe epigastric pain radiating to the back, eased by sitting forward; raised lipase.
- Myocardial infarction (inferior) — epigastric pain in the elderly or diabetic; do an ECG.
- Mesenteric ischaemia — pain out of proportion to examination, postprandial.[1]
Always look for the alarm features above; their presence moves the patient straight to urgent OGD.[1]
Bedside assessment — seek the complication, not the diagnosis
In uncomplicated PUD the examination is often unremarkable apart from epigastric tenderness. The job at the bedside is to detect the complications:[4][5]
- Peritonism (rigidity, guarding, rebound, absent bowel sounds) — perforation until proven otherwise.
- Signs of volume loss (tachycardia, hypotension, postural drop, cool peripheries, oliguria) — bleeding.
- Melaena on rectal examination; a succussion splash and visible gastric peristalsis — gastric outlet obstruction.
- Pallor of anaemia; signs of chronic liver disease (varices, not PUD, may be the bleeder).
- An epigastric mass or Virchow (left supraclavicular) node — gastric cancer.[1]
Bedside observations (heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, urine output, GCS) define severity in bleeding or complicated PUD. A postural drop in systolic blood pressure (over 20 mmHg) or a rise in pulse (over 30 bpm on standing) signals significant volume loss (over 1 litre).[5]
Investigations — OGD first, then the tests that guide the cure
The gold standard — oesophagogastroduodenoscopy
OGD localises the ulcer, identifies stigmata of recent haemorrhage (spurting vessel, non-bleeding visible vessel, adherent clot, oozing, clean base), treats bleeding (injection, thermal, clips), and biopsies — for H. pylori and to exclude malignancy in every gastric ulcer. Gastric ulcers are re-endoscoped at 8 to 12 weeks to confirm healing and exclude cancer. A duodenal ulcer is essentially always benign and does not mandate biopsy for malignancy, though biopsies are taken for H. pylori.[4][5]
Tests for H. pylori — the critical exam area
The tests divide into invasive (biopsy at OGD) and non-invasive, and into those that detect active infection versus those that cannot.[1][3]
Invasive (biopsy at OGD)
- Rapid urease test (CLO test) — biopsy in urea agar; H. pylori urease turns it red. Fast (hours), cheap
- Histology — direct visualisation on Giemsa or HE; shows the organism and the gastritis pattern
- Culture — for resistance testing; reserved for treatment failure
- All three need the patient OFF PPIs for 2 weeks and antibiotics for 4 weeks, or false negatives occur
Non-invasive
- Urea breath test (UBT) — patient ingests 13C- or 14C-labelled urea; H. pylori urease splits it, releasing labelled CO2 in breath. Sensitivity 88 to 95 percent, specificity 95 to 100 percent; confirms ACTIVE infection; preferred test of cure
- Stool antigen test — sensitivity about 94 percent, specificity about 92 percent; detects active infection; the cheap outpatient option
- Serology (IgG) — detects past OR present; CANNOT distinguish current from resolved; NOT a test of cure; useful only in epidemiology or a never-treated patient
The crucial pre-test rule: stop PPIs for at least 2 weeks and antibiotics for at least 4 weeks before a urea breath test, stool antigen, or biopsy-based urease test — these agents suppress H. pylori and cause false negatives. (Serology is unaffected.)[1][3]
Bloods and other tests
FBC for anaemia of chronic bleeding (MCV and ferritin for iron deficiency). U&E, LFTs, coagulation, group and crossmatch in bleeding — a raised urea with normal creatinine is a bedside pointer to upper-GI bleeding (digested blood protein converted to urea). Fasting serum gastrin, off PPI, if Zollinger-Ellison is suspected. An erect chest X-ray or CT abdomen for free intra-abdominal gas indicates perforation.[1]
Risk-stratification scores in upper GI bleeding
Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) — a pre-endoscopy score predicting the need for intervention (transfusion, endoscopic or surgical treatment). Components: blood urea, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, haemoglobin, the presence of melaena or syncope, and major cardiac or hepatic disease. A score of 0 to 1 identifies very-low-risk patients who may be discharged with outpatient follow-up (ACG; ESGE uses GBS of 1 or less).[5][19]
Rockall score — a post-endoscopy score whose independent mortality predictors are age, shock, comorbidity, diagnosis, major stigmata of recent haemorrhage, and rebleeding. It categorises case-mix and can identify patients at negligible risk of death after endoscopy; unlike GBS it is not the pre-endoscopy "can I send this patient home" tool.[16][5]
The bleeding peptic ulcer — resuscitation precedes the scope[1]
For the bleeding peptic ulcer — the commonest life-threatening presentation — resuscitation precedes definitive treatment. Humour is off here; this is a resuscitation problem with a protocol.[5]
Bleeding peptic ulcer — the first hours
- 1
Risk-stratify
Glasgow-Blatchford score 0 to 1 identifies very-low-risk patients who may be discharged with outpatient follow-up
- 2
Restrictive transfusion
Transfuse red cells at a haemoglobin threshold of about 70 g/L
- 3
Before endoscopy
Erythromycin infusion is suggested before endoscopy
- 4
Urgent OGD
Within 24 hours; endoscopic therapy for ulcers with active spurting or oozing and for nonbleeding visible vessels
- 5
IV PPI
High-dose PPI after endoscopic haemostasis — omeprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg per hour for 72 hours (Lau 2000)
- 6
Rebleed or failed haemostasis
Repeat endoscopy for recurrent bleeding; transcatheter embolisation if endoscopic therapy fails
The single trial to cite for the IV PPI infusion is Lau et al., NEJM 2000 — after endoscopic haemostasis (epinephrine injection plus thermocoagulation) of bleeding peptic ulcers, omeprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg per hour for 72 hours cut recurrent bleeding within 30 days from 22.5 percent to 6.7 percent versus placebo. Surgery rates fell less clearly (3 vs 9 patients, P=0.14) and mortality did not differ significantly. It is the basis of the post-endoscopy IV PPI infusion that is now universal.[6]
Definitive management — find and remove the cause
The definitive ladder addresses the cause, heals the ulcer, and prevents recurrence. Get the cause wrong and the ulcer comes back.[1]
1. Eradicate H. pylori — the regimen is regional
The cure for H. pylori-associated ulcers. The first-line regimen is regional, driven by local clarithromycin resistance:[1][3]
UK
Clarithromycin triple therapy (a PPI plus clarithromycin plus amoxicillin or metronidazole) is restricted to patients with no previous macrolide exposure in regions where clarithromycin resistance is known to be low. Elsewhere — including most of current UK practice once resistance is no longer documented as low — bismuth quadruple or concomitant therapy is first-line. All eradication regimens run 14 days, and eradication should be confirmed.[1][9]
US
ACG (Chey 2017) confines clarithromycin triple therapy to patients with no previous macrolide exposure who reside where clarithromycin resistance is known to be low; most patients are better served by first-line bismuth quadruple therapy (PPI plus bismuth plus tetracycline plus metronidazole) or concomitant therapy (PPI plus clarithromycin plus amoxicillin plus metronidazole), given for 14 days (Toronto Consensus). After failed triple therapy, salvage uses bismuth quadruple or levofloxacin-based regimens, avoiding previously used antibiotics. Test of cure is mandatory.[1][9]
Maastricht VI/Florence (2022) treats H. pylori as an infectious disease — all infected patients should receive treatment — and demands careful selection of first-line and rescue therapies against continuously rising antibiotic resistance. In India, clarithromycin resistance is 35.64 percent (Dutta 2024 systematic review), so clarithromycin triple is not a safe default. 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy was non-inferior to 14-day bismuth quadruple (per-protocol 90.8 vs 91.3 percent) with significantly fewer adverse events.[2][3][21]
2. Test of cure — mandatory
Confirm eradication with a urea breath test or stool antigen at least 4 weeks after completing antibiotics and at least 2 weeks after stopping the PPI. (Serology cannot be used for cure — it stays positive.) Test of cure is essential after every eradication course because resistance-driven failure is common.[1][3]
3. Acid suppression for healing
A PPI is the mainstay of healing, continued for several weeks once the cause has been addressed. If a PPI is unavailable or contraindicated, an H2-receptor antagonist or a mucosal protectant (sucralfate) is an alternative.[4]
4. NSAID-induced ulcer
Stop the NSAID where possible and give a PPI to heal the ulcer. Misoprostol 200 micrograms twice or three times daily offers substantial protection against gastric and duodenal ulcers in long-term NSAID users and is better tolerated than four times daily; gastric-ulcer prevention shows a dose-response (Raskin). Test and eradicate H. pylori if co-existent: NSAID use carries a several-fold increased risk of upper GI bleeding, often without dyspeptic warning symptoms.[4][8][10]
5. Confirm gastric ulcer healing
Gastric ulcers must be re-endoscoped at 8 to 12 weeks to confirm healing and exclude malignancy; a non-healing ulcer demands re-biopsy and surgical referral. Duodenal ulcers are benign and need no routine repeat OGD once H. pylori is eradicated.[4]
Bleeding peptic ulcer — the management sequence
The perforated ulcer — and why you eradicate afterwards
Perforation is a surgical emergency: free gas, peritonitis, and an emergency laparotomy. The patch closure (Graham omental patch for a DU; resection for a GU) stops the leak — but the single trial to cite is Ng et al., Annals of Surgery 2000: after simple closure of a perforated DU, H. pylori eradication cut 1-year ulcer relapse from 38.1 percent to 4.8 percent versus omeprazole alone. So the operation fixes the hole, and the eradication fixes the disease — both are mandatory.[7]
The special ulcers and scenarios
- Stress ulcer prophylaxis (ICU) — a weak recommendation to use prophylaxis when the risk of clinically important GI bleeding is over 4 percent, and a weak recommendation not to use it at lower risk. Higher-risk features include coagulopathy, chronic liver disease, mechanical ventilation without enteral nutrition, or two or more of ventilation with enteral nutrition, AKI, sepsis, and shock. Suggest a PPI rather than an H2-receptor antagonist; do not use sucralfate. Bleeding reduction is balanced against a possible increase in pneumonia. Cook's classic independent risks remain respiratory failure (OR 15.6) and coagulopathy (OR 4.3) — prophylaxis can be withheld when neither is present.[11][17]
- Zollinger-Ellison syndrome — suspect with multiple, jejunal, or refractory ulcers with diarrhoea and acid hypersecretion. Confirm with a raised fasting serum gastrin (off PPI); localise the gastrinoma, treat with a high-dose PPI, and resect if localised.
- Curling ulcer — acute stress ulceration after major burns from hypovolaemia and splanchnic hypoperfusion; prevent with early enteral feeding and acid suppression.
- Cushing ulcer — stress ulcer after severe head injury or raised intracranial pressure, from direct vagal stimulation causing massive acid hypersecretion; high perforation risk.
- Marginal (anastomotic) ulcer — at a gastrojejunostomy after partial gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y; driven by acid on jejunal mucosa plus H. pylori; smoking and NSAIDs are cofactors.
- Refractory ulcer — failure to heal despite an adequate course of PPI. Reconsider: ongoing NSAID use, persistent H. pylori (adherence or resistance), Zollinger-Ellison, malignancy (re-biopsy), Crohn disease, cocaine, ischaemia, and non-adherence to the PPI.
Complications and the classic pitfalls
The four complications (and a fifth for gastric ulcers):[4][5]
- Bleeding — the commonest complication; the leading cause of non-variceal upper GI bleeding; managed by endoscopic therapy plus high-dose IV PPI infusion.
- Perforation — sudden severe peritonitis with free gas; emergency surgical repair (Graham patch for DU; resection for GU).
- Penetration — a posterior DU into the pancreas (back pain, raised amylase or lipase); no free gas, so it is often missed.
- Gastric outlet obstruction — from oedema and scarring of a pyloric-channel or DU; non-bilious projectile vomiting, succussion splash; decompress with an NG tube, correct the hypokalaemic hypochloraemic metabolic alkalosis from vomiting, then balloon dilatation or surgery.
- Malignant transformation (gastric ulcer only) — the reason every GU is biopsied and re-endoscoped.[1]
The classic pitfalls every candidate must name: failing to test and eradicate H. pylori; not performing a test of cure; relying on serology to confirm active infection; giving a PPI before a urea breath test (false negative); not biopsying a gastric ulcer; not re-endoscoping a gastric ulcer at 8 to 12 weeks; and missing perforation in an elderly painless NSAID ulcer presenting as vague sepsis. A further trap: over-transfusing a bleeding patient raises splanchnic venous pressure and precipitates rebleeding — stay restrictive.[1][4][5]
How PUD patients come to harm — the preventable list
- The older patient on an NSAID plus an anticoagulant who was never tested for H. pylori and bleeds torrentially.[8]
- A gastric ulcer treated with a PPI and never biopsied or re-endoscoped, presenting later as cancer.[4]
- A H. pylori eradication given with no test of cure, recurring within the year.[1]
- A bleeding patient over-transfused, rebleeding from a raised portal pressure.[5]
- A urea breath test done on a PPI, read as negative, and the patient sent home to bleed.[1]
- Aspirin for secondary prevention stopped and forgotten after a bleed, with an early thrombotic event.[5]
Special populations
- NSAID or aspirin users — give gastroprotection with a PPI; test and eradicate H. pylori before starting long-term NSAID therapy. For low-dose aspirin as secondary cardiovascular prophylaxis, ESGE recommends not interrupting aspirin; if it is interrupted, restart as soon as possible, preferably within 3 to 5 days. In Sung 2010, continuing aspirin 80 mg daily immediately after endoscopic haemostasis had more 30-day rebleeding (10.3 vs 5.4 percent) but lower all-cause mortality (1.3 vs 12.9 percent).[19][18][8]
- The elderly — present atypically (painless bleed or perforation), have more comorbidity, and bleed more often on NSAIDs; lower threshold for OGD and PPI prophylaxis.
- Anticoagulated patients — once bleeding is controlled, ESGE recommends resuming anticoagulation as soon as haemostasis is secure, preferably within or soon after 7 days, weighted by thromboembolic risk (this 7-day window is for anticoagulants, not aspirin).[19]
- Pregnancy — PUD is uncommon; defer non-urgent eradication until after delivery. Tetracycline- and bismuth-containing regimens are not used in pregnancy (labelled convention; no obstetric trial fetched this pass).
- Immunocompromised — consider CMV (giant ulcers, intranuclear inclusions on biopsy) and HSV ulcers; treat the underlying virus.
- Chronic kidney disease — higher ulcer and bleed risk; avoid NSAIDs.[1]
Prevention — the high-risk patient before the ulcer
Prevention targets the two dominant causes and the high-risk patient before the ulcer or its complication occurs.[4][8]
- Search-and-treat for H. pylori — H. pylori is an infectious disease and all infected patients merit treatment; prevention of gastric cancer and other complications demands effective, resistance-aware treatment strategies. Eradicate before starting long-term NSAID therapy.[3]
- Gastroprotect NSAIDs — most NSAID-related upper GI bleeding follows short-term use, often without dyspeptic warning symptoms (63.62 percent in Sostres), so prevention must reach beyond chronic rheumatology patients. Co-prescribe acid suppression; misoprostol 200 micrograms twice or three times daily offers substantial protection against gastric and duodenal ulcers and is better tolerated than four times daily (Raskin; gastric-ulcer prevention shows a dose-response).[8][10]
- Lifestyle — smoking cessation, moderate alcohol, stress management. Diet has modest symptomatic benefit but does not heal ulcers.
- Stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU — restrict to critically ill patients at genuinely high risk of clinically important bleeding, weighing benefit against pneumonia risk.[11]
The evidence — guidelines and the trials to cite
The guideline pillars — ACG (US, Chey 2017), the Toronto Consensus, and Maastricht VI/Florence (2022) — agree on the principles (eradicate H. pylori, heal with a PPI, gastroprotect NSAIDs, treat complications endoscopically) but differ on the first-line regimen, driven by local clarithromycin resistance. Duration matters: because of increasing failure of therapy, the Toronto consensus strongly recommends all eradication regimens run 14 days.[1][9]
Lau et al., NEJM 2000 — IV omeprazole after endoscopic haemostasis
After endoscopic haemostasis of actively bleeding ulcers or nonbleeding visible vessels (epinephrine injection plus thermocoagulation), omeprazole 80 mg IV bolus then 8 mg per hour for 72 hours cut recurrent bleeding within 30 days from 22.5 percent to 6.7 percent versus placebo; surgery (3 vs 9, P=0.14) and 30-day mortality (P=0.13) did not differ significantly — the basis of the post-endoscopy IV PPI infusion that is now universal.[6]
Yan et al., AJG 2024 — vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual
A multicentre randomised trial showed 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy was non-inferior to 14-day bismuth quadruple for first-line eradication (over 90 percent per-protocol: 90.8 vs 91.3 percent), with significantly fewer adverse events. Vonoprazan (a potassium-competitive acid blocker) may displace PPI-based regimens.[2]
Ng et al., Annals of Surgery 2000 — eradication at perforation
After simple closure of a perforated DU, H. pylori eradication cut 1-year ulcer relapse from 38.1 percent to 4.8 percent versus omeprazole alone — supporting eradication (not long-term acid suppression or definitive acid-reducing surgery) as the standard after patch closure.[7]
UCVB
- UUreasehydrolyses urea to ammonia then survives acid; basis of CLO and urea breath test
- CCagAinjected via type IV secretion; inflammation, ulcer, GASTRIC CANCER (cag PAI strains)
- VVacAvacuolating cytotoxin — pores, apoptosis, mucosal injury
- BBabAblood-group antigen-binding adhesin — binds Lewis-b, enables tight adherence
HNZSO
- HH. pyloricommonest — 95 percent of DU, 70 percent of GU (Cochrane)
- NNSAIDs or aspirinsecond; COX-1 inhibition then prostaglandin depletion; the leading cause of BLEEDING ulcers
- ZZollinger-Ellisongastrinoma — multiple, jejunal or refractory ulcers plus diarrhoea
- SStress (ICU)Curling (burns), Cushing (head injury); splanchnic hypoperfusion
- OOthermalignancy, Crohn, CMV or HSV, radiation, cocaine, idiopathic
The mantra: heal the ulcer with a PPI, but cure the disease by removing the cause — eradicate H. pylori and prove it, stop or gastroprotect the NSAID, and biopsy every gastric ulcer.[1][4]
Ward-round test — three stems
Stem 1 — the man from the top of the topic (answer)ShowHide
A 66-year-old on ibuprofen wakes with night pain eased by milk, then vomits coffee-grounds and passes melaena with a postural drop. What is the first 12 hours? Model: This is a bleeding peptic ulcer. Resuscitate, transfusing restrictively at a haemoglobin threshold of about 70 g/L, and risk-stratify with the Glasgow-Blatchford score (0 to 1 identifies very-low-risk patients who may be discharged with outpatient follow-up). Proceed to OGD within 24 hours for endoscopic haemostasis of active bleeding or a nonbleeding visible vessel, then a high-dose IV PPI — omeprazole 80 mg bolus then 8 mg per hour for 72 hours (Lau 2000), which cut recurrent bleeding from 22.5 to 6.7 percent at 30 days. Afterwards find the cause: test for H. pylori (urea breath test or stool antigen at least 4 weeks after antibiotics and 2 weeks off the PPI), eradicate with a regional regimen and confirm cure; review the NSAID; and re-endoscope any gastric ulcer to exclude malignancy.[5][6][2]
Stem 2 — the duodenal-versus-gastric discriminator (answer)ShowHide
An examiner asks: "How does the pain of a duodenal ulcer differ from a gastric ulcer, and what does that tell you about the acid?" Model: Duodenal pain is eased by food and wakes the patient at night; gastric pain is worsened by food. The mechanism is the acid story: a DU is driven by antral-predominant gastritis, hypergastrinaemia and acid hypersecretion — so food (which buffers acid) relieves the pain, and the empty stomach at 2 a.m. brings it back. A GU sits on corpus-predominant atrophic gastritis with normal or low acid, so eating stimulates the little acid there is and worsens the pain. That is why H. pylori — the same organism — makes a DU through acid excess and a GU through acid depletion, and why a DU is essentially never malignant while a GU must always be biopsied.[4]
Stem 3 — the perforated DU and what you do after the patch (answer)ShowHide
A 45-year-old smoker presents with sudden severe generalised abdominal pain, a rigid silent abdomen, and free gas under the diaphragm. At laparotomy a perforated DU is closed with an omental patch. What must happen next, and why? Model: The operation closes the hole; the disease is H. pylori, and it must be eradicated. Ng et al., Annals of Surgery 2000 showed that after simple closure of a perforated DU, H. pylori eradication cut 1-year ulcer relapse from 38.1 percent to 4.8 percent versus omeprazole alone. So the post-operative plan is: test for H. pylori (biopsy-based urease at surgery, or urea breath test or stool antigen after stopping the PPI for 2 weeks and antibiotics for 4 weeks), eradicate with a regional regimen, and confirm cure — plus smoking cessation (smoking impairs mucosal healing) and NSAID avoidance.[7]
References23ShowHide
- [1]Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection Am J Gastroenterol, 2017.PMID 28071659
- [2]Yan TL, Wang JH, He XJ, et al. Ten-Day Vonoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy vs Standard 14-Day Bismuth-Based Quadruple Therapy for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Am J Gastroenterol, 2024.PMID 37975609
- [3]Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, Rokkas T, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report Gut, 2022.PMID 35944925
- [4]Lanas A, Chan FKL. Peptic ulcer disease Lancet, 2017.PMID 28242110
- [5]Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding Am J Gastroenterol, 2021.PMID 33929377
- [6]Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al. Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers N Engl J Med, 2000.PMID 10922420
- [7]Ng EK, Lam YH, Sung JJ, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation: randomized controlled trial Ann Surg, 2000.PMID 10674604
- [8]Sostres C, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Lanas A. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug related upper gastrointestinal bleeding: types of drug use and patient profiles in real clinical practice Curr Med Res Opin, 2017.PMID 28569554
- [9]Fallone CA, Chiba N, van Zanten SV, et al. The Toronto Consensus for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Adults Gastroenterology, 2016.PMID 27102658
- [10]Raskin JB, White RH, Jackson JE, et al. Misoprostol dosage in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers: a comparison of three regimens Ann Intern Med, 1995.PMID 7625622
- [11]Ye Z, Reintam Blaser A, Lytvyn L, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis for critically ill patients: a clinical practice guideline BMJ, 2020.PMID 31907223
- [12]Ford AC, Gurusamy KS, Delaney B, Forman D, Moayyedi P Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori-positive people Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016.PMID 27092708
- [13]Huang JQ, Sridhar S, Hunt RH Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis Lancet, 2002.PMID 11809181
- [14]Tarasconi A, Coccolini F, Biffl WL, et al. Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines World J Emerg Surg, 2020.PMID 31921329
- [15]Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage Lancet, 2000.PMID 11073021
- [16]Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage Gut, 1996.PMID 8675081
- [17]Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group N Engl J Med, 1994.PMID 8284001
- [18]Sung JJ, Lau JY, Ching JY, et al. Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial Ann Intern Med, 2010.PMID 19949136
- [19]Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021 Endoscopy, 2021.PMID 33567467
- [20]Costa JMC, et al. Update on the pathogenesis and clinical management of Helicobacter pylori gastric infection and associated diseases World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol, 2025.PMID 41479869
- [21]Dutta S, Jain S, Das K, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in India over the past two decades: A systematic review Helicobacter, 2024.PMID 38415810
- [22]Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC Peptic ulcer disease Am Fam Physician, 2007.PMID 17956071
- [23]Quach DT, et al. Vietnam Association of Gastroenterology (VNAGE) consensus on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection Front Med, 2022.PMID 36714104