Haematology · General Medicine
Myeloproliferative Disorders (PV, ET, MF & CML)
Also known as Myeloproliferative neoplasms · MPN · Polycythaemia vera · Essential thrombocythemia · Primary myelofibrosis · PV ET MF CML
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal disorders of haematopoietic stem cells causing overproduction of mature myeloid lineages, driven by mutually exclusive JAK2, CALR and MPL mutations (plus BCR-ABL1 in CML). Polycythaemia vera (PV) = raised haematocrit plus JAK2 mutation and low serum erythropoietin; presents with hyperviscosity (headache, visual disturbance, thrombosis, aquagenic pruritus), splenomegaly, gout; treat with phlebotomy to keep the haematocrit below 45 percent plus once-daily low-dose aspirin, adding cytoreduction (hydroxycarbamide first-line) for high-risk patients. Essential thrombocythemia (ET) = sustained platelet count over 450 with megakaryocytic hyperplasia; risk-stratify by age, thrombosis history and JAK2 status — aspirin for low-risk, cytoreduction for high-risk disease. Primary myelofibrosis = marrow fibrosis, extramedullary haematopoiesis, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms; ruxolitinib for symptomatic splenomegaly and symptoms, allogeneic stem cell transplant for very-high/high-risk disease. Chronic myeloid leukaemia = BCR-ABL1-positive; a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor first-line with quantitative BCR-ABL1 PCR monitoring on the International Scale.
On this page
Study tools
Practise this topic
Exam tags
Red flags
- Markedly raised haematocrit (over 0.49 M / over 0.48 F) with low EPO and JAK2 mutation — polycythaemia vera; venesect to under 0.45
- Sustained platelets over 450 with thrombosis or erythromelalgia — essential thrombocythemia; aspirin plus cytoreduction
- Massive splenomegaly with tear-drop cells and leukoerythroblastic film — primary myelofibrosis
- Marked leucocytosis with left shift, basophilia and splenomegaly — screen for BCR-ABL1 / Philadelphia chromosome (CML)
- Splanchnic vein thrombosis (Budd-Chiari, portal vein) — screen JAK2 even if counts are normal (occult MPN)
- Platelets over 1500 in ET with bleeding — acquired von Willebrand disease; cytoreduce (paradox: high platelets cause bleeding, not thrombosis)
- Rising blasts in a known MPN or CML — transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia; urgent
Meet the patient
A 58-year-old man walks into the clinic ruddy-faced, embarrassed to admit that a hot shower leaves him itching for an hour and that his left big toe has throbbed all week. His haematocrit is 0.58, his serum erythropoietin is suppressed, and JAK2 V617F is positive. The registrar reaches for the venesection pack before the film is even back — and is mostly right.[2]
The question this vignette plants is the question every MPN stem turns on: is this overproduction clonal or reactive — and which lineage is the clone driving? Hold that question and the four diseases collapse into a single frame.[1]
The molecular fork — JAK2 for the trio, Philadelphia for CML
The MPN split on one molecular test: JAK2 V617F unites PV, ET and PMF; BCR-ABL1 (the Philadelphia chromosome) stands alone for CML. Before you label any sustained high count as an MPN, exclude BCR-ABL1 — because CML answers to a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and almost nothing else does.[1]
William Dameshek grouped these four together in 1951 on clinical intuition alone — a decade before the Philadelphia chromosome and four decades before JAK2. He was right, and the reason is at the marrow level: the MPN clone retains the ability to differentiate into mature, working cells, so the damage comes from excess — hyperviscosity, thrombosis, organomegaly — not from marrow failure. Acute leukaemia, by contrast, floods the marrow with immature, non-functional blasts.[1]
The four entities are told apart by the dominant lineage that is overproduced (red cells in PV, platelets in ET, none effectively in PMF because the marrow is scarred, granulocytes in CML) and by the driver mutation:[1]
Polycythaemia vera (PV)
- Red-cell lineage: raised haematocrit (over 0.49 M / over 0.48 F)
- JAK2 V617F in ~95 percent (or JAK2 exon 12 in ~3 to 5 percent)
- Serum EPO LOW (autonomous clone suppresses it)
- Plethoric facies, aquagenic pruritus, thrombosis, splenomegaly, gout
- Hypercellular marrow with panmyelosis and pleomorphic megakaryocytes
Essential thrombocythemia (ET)
- Platelet lineage: platelets over 450 x10^9/L sustained
- Megakaryocytic hyperplasia with large mature megakaryocytes
- JAK2 50 to 60 percent; CALR ~25 percent; MPL ~5 percent (triple-negative ~15 percent)
- Microvascular thrombosis (erythromelalgia) and bleeding; acquired vWD over 1500
- Normal haematocrit and essentially normal marrow cellularity
Primary myelofibrosis (PMF)
- Fibrosis replaces marrow — ineffective extramedullary haematopoiesis
- Reticulin/collagen fibrosis on trephine; atypical megakaryocyte clusters
- JAK2 ~60 percent, CALR ~25 percent, MPL ~5 to 10 percent
- Massive splenomegaly, tear-drop cells, leukoerythroblastic film, high LDH
- Worst prognosis of the three; highest leukaemic transformation (~10 to 20 percent)
Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML)
- Granulocyte lineage: high WBC with left shift, **basophilia**, thrombocytosis
- BCR-ABL1 fusion from t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) — Philadelphia chromosome — is **defining**
- Low leucocyte alkaline phosphatase (historical); driver = p210 BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase
- Massive splenomegaly, fatigue, sweats, gout; three phases (chronic, accelerated, blast)
- Treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (imatinib/dasatinib/nilotinib) — near-normal survival
WHO 2016 and the 2022 ICC/WHO revisions integrate morphology, genetics and clinical features. The single subtype that earns the most viva marks is pre-fibrotic PMF (pre-PMF): it mimics ET on the count but carries a higher leukaemic-transformation risk, and it is separated by atypical megakaryocyte clusters, mild reticulin fibrosis (grade 0 to 1), a raised LDH, anaemia and constitutional symptoms. CML is defined by BCR-ABL1 and is excluded from the JAK2-driven trio by a negative test for the fusion.[1]
How common, who, and why a high count is never labelled first
A sustained high count is never labelled an MPN until the reactive causes are excluded and the driver mutation is confirmed. Reactive polycythaemia, thrombocytosis and leucocytosis are far commoner than any of these four — and a junior who labels first will be wrong more often than right.[1]
The MPN are diseases of middle and older age (median presentation 50 to 70 years), with two twists the examiner likes: CML has a younger peak, and ET occurs in young women, where pregnancy planning reshapes the whole management. Incidence is roughly 0.7 to 2.6 per 100,000 per year for PV, 0.6 to 2.5 for ET, 0.2 to 1.0 for PMF (the least common but most aggressive) and 1 to 2 for CML. ET has a slight female predominance; PV and CML a slight male predominance.[1][2][3]
Recognised risk factors are thin on the ground: increasing age, male sex for PV and CML, rare familial predisposition, and ionising-radiation or benzene/solvent exposure (classically linked to CML and AML). Almost all PV is JAK2 V617F positive (or exon 12); CALR and MPL account for most JAK2-negative ET and PMF. In CML the BCR-ABL1 fusion is acquired somatic (not inherited) and present in virtually 100 percent of cases.[1]
The JAK2 engine — why the clone runs without a key
The molecular spine of the BCR-ABL1-negative MPN is the JAK2 V617F mutation — a single gain-of-function hit that lets the clone proliferate without any cytokine signal. It is a valine-to-phenylalanine substitution at position 617 in the JAK2 pseudokinase (JH2) domain, which releases the kinase from autoinhibition and renders it constitutively active.[1]
JAK2 is the intracellular signalling partner of the erythropoietin (EPO) receptor, the thrombopoietin receptor (MPL) and the G-CSF receptor, so one mutation can drive three lineages. PV red-cell precursors form endogenous erythroid colonies (EEC) in culture without added EPO, and the autonomous red-cell mass suppresses serum EPO by negative feedback. That is the basis of the low serum EPO test — the single best discriminator of PV from secondary polycythaemia.[1]
The downstream damage is lineage-specific — and each line below is a viva answer in itself:[1]
- PV — hyperviscosity. The raised red-cell mass thickens the blood: sluggish flow, endothelial activation and thrombosis (stroke, MI, Budd-Chiari). High cell turnover drives hyperuricaemia and gout, and histamine from basophils causes aquagenic pruritus — itch triggered by a warm bath or shower.
- ET — platelet dysfunction. The clone makes large, dysregulated platelets that aggregate in arterioles, producing microvascular thrombosis (erythromelalgia, transient visual disturbance, atypical chest pain). The paradox trap: at counts over 1500, platelets adsorb high-molecular-weight von Willebrand factor, producing acquired von Willebrand disease and bleeding — the counterintuitive "high count, bleed not clot" picture.
- PMF — fibrosis and extramedullary haematopoiesis. Abnormal megakaryocytes and monocytes release TGF-beta, PDGF and bFGF, stimulating fibroblasts to lay down reticulin and collagen and efface the marrow. Haematopoiesis shifts to the spleen and liver, producing massive organomegaly; mechanically distorted cells leave the film with tear-drop (dacryocyte) poikilocytes and nucleated red cells — the leukoerythroblastic picture.
- CML — the BCR-ABL1 kinase. The Philadelphia chromosome t(9;22) fuses ABL1 (chromosome 9) with the BCR breakpoint on chromosome 22, generating the p210 BCR-ABL1 fusion protein — a constitutively active tyrosine kinase firing RAS/MAPK, JAK/STAT and PI3K/AKT, with characteristic basophilia.[3][4]
The alternative drivers in the JAK2-negative trio are CALR (calreticulin) and MPL. The clinically useful rule: CALR-mutated disease runs a higher platelet count, a lower thrombotic risk and a better survival than JAK2-mutated disease, and is the commonest driver in JAK2-negative ET and PMF. Triple-negative MPN (JAK2, CALR and MPL all wild-type) carries a distinct, often less favourable prognosis and demands meticulous exclusion of mimics.[1][7][8]
Why one mutation makes three diseases — the viva answerShowHide
JAK2 V617F is a single clone, but its allele burden and the stem cell in which it arises set the phenotype. A high allele burden in an erythroid-biased stem cell drives PV; a lower burden in a megakaryocytic-biased cell drives ET; secondary events (additional mutations, megakaryocyte cytokine excess) tip the marrow toward fibrosis and PMF. Exon 12 JAK2 mutations produce a PV-only phenotype. This is why a JAK2-positive patient can evolve from PV to post-PV myelofibrosis over years — the clone acquires new hits.[1][8]
Four faces at the bedside — read the count, read the film
Each MPN announces itself in a different lineage on the full blood count and film, and the film usually steers the diagnosis before the molecular panel returns. The MPN present either as an incidental abnormal count or with symptoms of hyperviscosity, thrombosis, bleeding, organomegaly or hypermetabolism.[1]
Polycythaemia vera is the plethoric patient: a ruddy complexion, headache, dizziness, tinnitus and blurred vision (hyperviscosity), aquagenic pruritus (intense itch after a warm bath — virtually pathognomonic), splenomegaly with early satiety, gout from hyperuricaemia, and thrombosis (stroke, MI, peripheral arterial occlusion, or Budd-Chiari and splanchnic vein thrombosis). Erythromelalgia — warm, red, painful swollen hands and feet relieved by aspirin — is shared with ET.[2][9]
Essential thrombocythemia is most often an incidental thrombocytosis on a routine count. Symptomatic disease brings microvascular thrombosis — erythromelalgia, atypical chest pain, headache, visual disturbance and transient ischaemic attacks — and, less often, major arterial or venous thrombosis or bleeding (mucocutaneous, at extreme thrombocytosis from acquired von Willebrand disease). Splenomegaly is mild and present in roughly half.[1]
Primary myelofibrosis is the constitutional and abdominal patient: fatigue, weight loss, night sweats, low-grade fever, and massive splenomegaly (early satiety, abdominal discomfort, splenic infarction pain, portal hypertension and ascites) — the spleen can reach the pelvis. Add hepatomegaly, bone pain, gout, pruritus and the symptoms of cytopenias (infection, bleeding, exertional dyspnoea from anaemia).[1]
Chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase is frequently discovered on a routine count showing marked leucocytosis with a left shift, basophilia, eosinophilia and thrombocytosis. Symptomatic patients describe fatigue, weight loss, early satiety, left-upper-quadrant fullness from splenomegaly (often massive), night sweats and gout.[3][4]
Presenting emergencies — sober, not curious: Budd-Chiari or splanchnic vein thrombosis (abdominal pain, ascites, tender hepatomegaly); stroke or MI from hyperviscosity in PV or ET; splenic infarction and hyperuricaemic acute kidney injury in PMF; leucostasis (pulmonary or cerebral) in extreme hyperleucocytosis of CML blast phase; priapism in CML; and, in any MPN, rising blasts signalling transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia.[1]
The classic atypical presentation — and a favourite exam trap — is a JAK2-positive splanchnic vein thrombosis with a NORMAL peripheral count: occult MPN. A young woman with recurrent pregnancy loss and a high platelet count may have ET with antiphospholipid overlap.[1]
Primary or secondary? The single discriminator is serum EPO
The single best discriminator of primary from secondary polycythaemia is serum EPO — low in PV, high or normal in secondary. Order it on every unexplained raised haematocrit, alongside JAK2, before the marrow is even discussed.[2]
The classic trap: a normal oxygen saturation does not exclude a clonal cause. The clone makes red cells autonomously — it does not need hypoxia — so check EPO and JAK2, not the pulse oximeter alone. The flip side is equally dangerous: a high EPO with hypoxia is appropriate secondary polycythaemia, and venesecting it treats a number, not a patient.[2]
Primary (PV)
- Clonal — JAK2 V617F (or exon 12) positive
- Serum EPO LOW
- Raised absolute red-cell mass; arterial oxygen saturation normal
- Plethora, aquagenic pruritus, splenomegaly, thrombosis, gout
- Hypercellular marrow with panmyelosis; EEC positive
Secondary — appropriate (HIGH EPO)
- Chronic hypoxia: COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, high-altitude living
- Cyanotic / right-to-left congenital heart disease
- Smoking, obstructive sleep apnoea
- EPO appropriately HIGH; treat the underlying hypoxia
- No JAK2 mutation; normal spleen; normal oxygen saturation excludes most
Secondary — inappropriate (HIGH EPO)
- EPO-secreting tumour: renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, uterine fibroid, cerebellar haemangioblastoma, pheochromocytoma
- Renal cysts, post-renal-transplant erythrocytosis
- EPO HIGH but no hypoxia; image kidneys/liver/cerebellum
- No JAK2 mutation
Apparent (relative) polycythaemia
- Dehydration, diuretics, smoking, hypertension, obesity — Gaisbock syndrome
- Normal red-cell MASS but reduced plasma volume
- EPO normal; resolves with rehydration / lifestyle change
- No splenomegaly, no JAK2
Thrombocytosis is separated from ET by excluding reactive causes — infection, inflammation (CRP high), iron deficiency (check ferritin), post-splenectomy, post-bleed, malignancy, rebound after marrow recovery — using CRP, ferritin, history and persistence over time. A clonal JAK2, CALR or MPL mutation or typical marrow morphology confirms ET. Reactive thrombocytosis settles as the trigger resolves and rarely exceeds 1000 x10^9/L.[2]
Leucocytosis with a left shift and splenomegaly (the CML picture) is mimicked by leukaemoid reaction — massive reactive leucocytosis from sepsis, with toxic granulation and a high leucocyte alkaline phosphatase score, in contrast to CML's low score. Also consider chronic neutrophilic leukaemia, other myeloid neoplasms and severe infection; the discriminator is BCR-ABL1 testing, blood film and the clinical context.[1]
Massive splenomegaly with a leukoerythroblastic film (the PMF picture) also occurs with metastatic carcinoma, miliary tuberculosis, visceral leishmaniasis, storage disorders (Gaucher), hairy cell leukaemia and other marrow-infiltrative processes — separated by marrow biopsy and the relevant infection or typing screens.[1]
Splanchnic (Budd-Chiari, portal or mesenteric) vein thrombosis should always prompt JAK2, CALR and MPL testing even with a normal blood count, because occult MPN is a leading cause and the count may not yet be abnormal. This is the single highest-yield trap in the topic.[1]
The bedside round — which lineage is overproduced?
Bedside examination in a suspected MPN rarely makes the diagnosis on its own; its job is to suggest the lineage and reveal the complications. Run it in this order:[1]
- General — a plethoric (ruddy) complexion and conjunctival suffusion point to PV; cachexia and sweating to PMF; pallor and bruising to cytopenias (PMF, blast phase).
- Hands and skin — erythromelalgia (warm red swollen digits relieved by aspirin) in PV and ET; gouty tophi; scratch marks from pruritus; bruising from acquired vWD or cytopenias.
- Abdomen — palpate for splenomegaly (mild in PV and ET, moderate in CML, massive in PMF) and hepatomegaly; assess for ascites (portal hypertension in PMF or Budd-Chiari).
- Cardiovascular and neurological — signs of thrombosis (focal neurology, ischaemic limb, hypertension) and a hepatic bruit or ascites (Budd-Chiari).
- Lymph nodes — generally not enlarged in MPN; prominent lymphadenopathy points to lymphoma or blast-phase transformation.[1]
Named signs worth knowing for the viva: plethora (PV), aquagenic pruritus (PV, after a warm bath), erythromelalgia (PV and ET), splenomegaly graded in centimetres below the costal margin, and the leukoerythroblastic film (PMF and marrow infiltration).[1]
Investigations — bloods, film, marrow, and the molecular fork
First-line bloods in any suspected MPN: full blood count with film, JAK2 V617F mutation screen, serum erythropoietin, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, urate, LDH, ferritin and CRP — add CALR and MPL if JAK2 is negative and PV is excluded. The film steers the diagnosis before the panel returns: PV is densely packed with red cells; ET shows large platelets; PMF shows tear-drop poikilocytes, nucleated red cells and a leukoerythroblastic picture; CML shows a full granulocytic left shift with basophilia and eosinophilia.[1][2]
Bone-marrow aspirate and trephine with reticulin staining is central to all four. PV: hypercellular marrow with panmyelosis and pleomorphic megakaryocytes, absent iron stores. ET: megakaryocytic hyperplasia with large mature megakaryocytes, near-normal cellularity. PMF: atypical megakaryocyte clusters with reticulin (grade 2 to 3) or collagen fibrosis, often osteosclerosis and a "dry tap". CML: marked granulocytic hyperplasia with small dwarf megakaryocytes. Cytogenetics exclude CML (BCR-ABL1 negative) in PV, ET and PMF and flag high-risk lesions (complex karyotype, del(5q), -7/del(7q), i(17q), +8, 12p-).[1]
In suspected CML the defining tests are karyotyping for t(9;22), FISH for BCR-ABL1, and quantitative RT-PCR for the BCR-ABL1 transcript (p210) on blood or marrow — and the same RT-PCR then monitors response to tyrosine-kinase therapy on the International Scale (IS).[3][4]
Diagnostic criteria (reproduced)
WHO 2016 — Polycythaemia vera (diagnosis requires either all 3 major, or the first 2 major plus 1 minor):
- Major 1 — a sustained haemoglobin over 16.5 g/dL in men / over 16 g/dL in women, or haematocrit over 0.49 in men / over 0.48 in women (the WHO 2016 thresholds, deliberately lowered to catch disease earlier; the older haemoglobin over 18.5 g/dL in men / over 16.5 g/dL in women, haematocrit over 0.52 in men, and red-cell mass over 25 percent above predicted are the historical equivalents).
- Major 2 — JAK2 V617F or JAK2 exon 12 mutation present.
- Minor — bone-marrow trilineage myeloproliferation; subnormal serum EPO.[11][2][13]
WHO 2016 — Essential thrombocythemia (all 4 major required):
- Platelets over 450 x10^9/L sustained.
- Bone marrow proliferation mainly megakaryocytic, with enlarged mature megakaryocytes; no significant granulocytic or erythroid left-shift.
- Does not meet criteria for CML (BCR-ABL1 negative), PV, PMF or MDS.
- JAK2, CALR or MPL clonal marker present (the mutually exclusive driver mutations — JAK2 in about 55 percent, CALR in about 25 percent, MPL in about 3 to 5 percent), OR reactive thrombocytosis excluded.[2][11]
WHO 2016 — Primary myelofibrosis distinguishes overt (fibrotic) PMF from pre-fibrotic PMF by reticulin grade; both require clonal markers, megakaryocytic atypia, and exclusion of CML, MDS and reactive fibrosis.[12]
Risk scores (reproduced)
DIPSS — Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for PMF (Passamonti, IWG-MRT). Scored at any point in the disease; each factor carries the points shown:[10]
DIPSS — PMF risk score
DIPSS categories are Low (0 points), Intermediate-1 (1 to 2), Intermediate-2 (3 to 4) and High (5 to 6), each step carrying a several-fold change in survival; Intermediate-2 and High risk in a transplant-eligible patient trigger consideration of allogeneic stem cell transplant.[10]
Risk stratification in ET — the current reviews separate four categories: very low (age 60 or under, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild-type), low (as very low but JAK2-mutated), intermediate (over 60, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild-type) and high (thrombosis history, or over 60 with JAK2 mutation); in PV there are simply two categories: high (over 60 or prior thrombosis) and low (neither). In routine practice this collapses to the simpler low-risk vs high-risk split, with JAK2 positivity nudging borderline patients toward treatment.[11][2]
CML phases are defined by blood and marrow: chronic phase (blasts under 10 percent), accelerated phase (blasts 10 to 19 percent, basophilia over 20 percent, platelets under 100 or over 1000 x10^9/L unrelated to therapy, clonal cytogenetic evolution, or progressive splenomegaly), and blast phase (blasts 20 percent or more — about 30 percent lymphoid, 70 percent myeloid). Phase decides prognosis and whether an allogeneic transplant is on the table.[3][4]
Resuscitation — treat the thrombus, then the clone
Treat the acute event first, then initiate disease control. In the resuscitation block the tone stays flat — these are clotting, bleeding or blast crises, and there is no room for flourish.[1][2]
- Acute thrombosis (stroke, MI, Budd-Chiari) — standard anticoagulation or reperfusion as indicated plus urgent cytoreduction: venesection in PV to drive the haematocrit under 0.45 (all patients with PV require phlebotomy to keep the haematocrit below 45 percent), and hydroxycarbamide — the first-line cytoreductive drug in both PV and ET — for uncontrolled high counts.
- Budd-Chiari and splanchnic vein thrombosis — therapeutic anticoagulation, lifelong when an MPN is confirmed; screen JAK2, CALR and MPL regardless of the count.
- Leucostasis or extreme hyperleucocytosis — hydration, cytoreduction with hydroxycarbamide, an urgent tyrosine-kinase inhibitor in CML, allopurinol and tumour-lysis prophylaxis.
- Hyperuricaemic acute kidney injury — aggressive hydration, urate-lowering therapy (allopurinol or rasburicase) and treatment of the underlying cell turnover.
- Acquired von Willebrand bleeding at extreme thrombocytosis (platelets over 1000 x10^9/L) — screening for acquired von Willebrand syndrome is recommended before giving aspirin in extreme thrombocytosis; if it is bleeding: stop the aspirin, cytoreduce urgently.[2][11]
Definitive therapy — risk-adapted, four diseases
Management is risk-adapted: the goal in PV and ET is thrombosis prevention; in PMF it is symptom, spleen and cytopenia control (and cure for the transplant-eligible minority); in CML it is a deep molecular response on a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, with the option of treatment-free remission.[1][2][3]
Polycythaemia vera
- Venesect to a haematocrit under 0.45 — every patient with PV requires phlebotomy to keep the haematocrit below 45 percent. In the CYTO-PV randomised trial (Marchioli, NEJM 2013), a tight haematocrit target (under 0.45) beat a liberal target of 0.45 to 0.50: the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI or major thrombosis occurred in 2.7 percent versus 9.8 percent of patients — which is why under 0.45 is quoted as the target.[14][11]
- Once-daily low-dose aspirin (81 mg in the trials) — the ECLAP randomised trial (Landolfi, NEJM 2004) enrolled 518 patients with PV who had no clear indication or contraindication for aspirin; aspirin 100 mg daily reduced the composite of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, pulmonary embolism, major venous thrombosis or cardiovascular death (relative risk 0.40) without significantly increasing major bleeding.[6]
- Cytoreduce when high-risk (age over 60 or prior thrombosis): first-line hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea); second-line options are interferon-alpha and busulfan. JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib are not recommended in PV unless for severe protracted pruritus or marked splenomegaly not responding to other drugs.[2][11]
- Supportive — urate-lowering treatment for hyperuricaemia or gout, cardiovascular risk-factor control, and thrombosis prophylaxis perioperatively and in hospital.[2]
Essential thrombocythemia
- All patients — control cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes, lipids); the goal of therapy in both PV and ET is prevention of thrombohaemorrhagic complications.[2][11]
- Very low-risk (age 60 or under, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild-type) — might not require any therapy; low-risk (the same but JAK2-mutated) — at least once-daily low-dose aspirin.[11]
- High-risk (prior thrombosis, or over 60 with JAK2 mutation) — cytoreductive therapy is recommended: first-line hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea); second-line options are interferon-alpha and busulfan. Cytoreduction is not mandatory for intermediate-risk patients (over 60 without thrombosis and JAK2 wild-type).[2][11]
- Extreme thrombocytosis with bleeding (acquired von Willebrand syndrome) — screening for AvWS is recommended before giving aspirin when platelets run extremely high; if it is bleeding: hold the aspirin, urgent cytoreduction.[2]
Primary myelofibrosis
- Ruxolitinib (oral JAK1/2 inhibitor) for symptomatic splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms — in the COMFORT-II randomised trial (Harrison, NEJM 2012), 219 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis were assigned oral ruxolitinib versus best available therapy: 28 percent achieved at least a 35 percent spleen-volume reduction at week 48 versus 0 percent with best available therapy, with durable responses, symptom improvement, and mostly grade 1 to 2 non-haematologic toxicity; the leading toxicities were thrombocytopenia and anaemia.[5] Conventional drug treatment for splenomegaly also includes hydroxyurea, and fedratinib is FDA-approved for ruxolitinib failures.[12]
- Anaemia — transfusion support; conventional drug options include androgens, prednisone, thalidomide and danazol.[12]
- Allogeneic stem cell transplant — the only curative option — the preferred treatment for very-high- and high-risk disease by MIPSSv2; observation alone is advised for low and very low risk (estimated 10-year survival 56 to 92 percent versus 0 to 13 percent for high/very high), while treatment-requiring intermediate-risk patients are best served by clinical trials.[12]
- Supportive and palliative — transfusion support, antimicrobial prophylaxis where indicated, symptom control and management of portal hypertension.[12]
Chronic myeloid leukaemia
CML — first-line TKI choice and monitoring (ELN 2020)
- 1
Confirm BCR-ABL1 by quantitative RT-PCR wherever possible, with karyotype/FISH at diagnosis; assess phase (chronic / accelerated / blast)
- 2
Start a first-line tyrosine-kinase inhibitor in chronic phase — imatinib (brand or generic), dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib are all available first-line; generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment. Choice balances survival versus treatment-free-remission aims, disease risk, drug cost and toxicity profile against comorbidities
- 3
Monitor response by BCR-ABL1 quantitative PCR on the International Scale; TKI dosing is more flexible than in the registration trials and dose adjustment can manage toxicity before switching
- 4
Early molecular response: greater than 10 percent BCR-ABL1 (IS) at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed — a change of treatment is recommended when molecular milestones are not reached
- 5
In patients not candidates for treatment-free remission, BCR-ABL1 (IS) transcript levels under 1 percent are acceptable and need not warrant a change of TKI — survival is virtually similar to that with deeper molecular remissions
- 6
Failure, intolerance or resistance: kinase-domain mutation testing and switch of TKI; for true resistance to second-generation TKIs or the T315I gatekeeper mutation, third-generation options are preferred — ponatinib first (cumulative experience including T315I-mutated CML), asciminib as an alternative with possibly better toxicity but lesser T315I activity
- 7
Allogeneic transplant remains a therapeutic option particularly for advanced-phase CML
Allogeneic stem cell transplant is no longer first-line in CML — per ELN 2020 it continues as a therapeutic option particularly for advanced-phase disease, while most chronic-phase patients on a TKI now have a normal life expectancy; treatment discontinuation may be considered for durable deep molecular response with the goal of treatment-free remission. TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy.[4][3]
Escalation triggers across the MPN: failure to reach the target haematocrit on venesection; intolerance or resistance to hydroxycarbamide; progressive splenomegaly or worsening symptoms in PMF; rising blasts (transformation to AML); and transplant-eligibility assessment. In CML, loss of a previously achieved molecular response is itself an escalation trigger prompting mutation testing.[1]
The long view — subtypes, evolution, and what to watch for
- Pre-fibrotic PMF (pre-PMF) mimics ET but is separated by atypical megakaryocyte clusters, mild reticulin fibrosis (grade 0 to 1), a raised LDH, anaemia and more constitutional symptoms. It carries a higher leukaemic-transformation risk than ET, so it earns closer surveillance and earlier consideration of transplant.
- Post-PV and post-ET myelofibrosis — PV and ET may each evolve into a myelofibrotic phase (post-PV MF, post-ET MF) over years; suspect it when splenomegaly worsens, new cytopenias or tear-drop cells appear, and LDH rises; management parallels PMF.
- JAK2-positive splanchnic vein thrombosis with normal counts — treat as occult MPN: lifelong anticoagulation, cytoreduction if counts later rise, and surveillance.
- CML treatment-free remission (TFR) — patients with stable deep molecular response (MR4.5) for two or more years on a TKI, in a specialist centre, may attempt to discontinue the TKI under close molecular monitoring; roughly 40 to 60 percent maintain remission, the rest relapse (usually within 6 months) and regain response on restarting.
- CML blast phase — myeloid versus lymphoid; treated with TKI plus chemotherapy appropriate to the phenotype to achieve a second chronic phase, then allogeneic stem cell transplant.
- Pregnancy and the MPN — see Special Populations below.[1]
Disease evolution across the MPN — what to watch for over years
- Year 0 (diagnosis)Hyperviscosity and thrombosis dominate PV/ET; cytoreduction and aspirin begin. In CML, a TKI is started immediately and the BCR-ABL1 transcript begins to fall. In PMF, spleen size and symptoms are the presenting problem.
- First 1 to 3 yearsTarget counts held (Hct under 0.45 in PV; platelets under 400 to 600 in ET). CML: early molecular response (BCR-ABL1 IS under 10 percent at 3 months) then major molecular response (under 0.1 percent) by 12 months. Watch for cytopenias and treatment toxicity.
- 5 to 10 yearsRisk of evolution. PV may transform to post-PV myelofibrosis (worsening splenomegaly, tear-drop cells, rising LDH) in ~10 to 15 percent; ET to post-ET MF in ~10 percent. PMF may transform to AML (lifetime risk ~10 to 20 percent). Suspect transformation with rising peripheral blasts, new cytopenias, or loss of a previously held molecular response.
- Long termCML with sustained deep molecular response (MR4.5 for over 2 years) may attempt treatment-free remission in a specialist centre. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative option for PMF and for resistant/blast-phase CML. Cardiovascular disease becomes a leading competing cause of death as patients age.
Complications, and the traps that cost marks
Disease complications: arterial and venous thrombosis (stroke, MI, peripheral arterial occlusion, Budd-Chiari — the leading cause of death in PV and ET), major bleeding from acquired von Willebrand disease at extreme thrombocytosis, evolution to post-PV or post-ET myelofibrosis, and transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia (risk highest in PMF, ~10 to 20 percent; ~5 to 10 percent in PV; ~2 to 5 percent in ET). In PMF add massive splenomegaly (splenic infarction, portal hypertension, cachexia) and transfusion iron overload. In CML, untreated or resistant disease progresses through accelerated to blast phase, with worsening cytopenias, infection and bleeding.[1][3]
Treatment complications — know them by drug: hydroxycarbamide (cytopenias, oral and leg ulcers, mucocutaneous pigmentation; leukaemogenicity debated but generally low-risk at standard doses); anagrelide (headache, palpitations, fluid retention, tachyarrhythmia, pulmonary hypertension); interferon-alpha (flu-like illness, depression, autoimmune phenomena, thyroid dysfunction); ruxolitinib (cytopenias, immunosuppression with tuberculosis and herpes zoster reactivation, and a withdrawal syndrome on abrupt cessation). For the TKIs: imatinib (fluid retention, periorbital oedema, cytopenias, nausea); dasatinib (pleural effusion, pulmonary arterial hypertension); nilotinib (QT prolongation, hyperglycaemia, pancreatitis, vascular events).[1]
The classic diagnostic pitfalls — the ones that cost marks:[1]
- Labelling "secondary" polycythaemia without checking serum EPO and JAK2 — a normal oxygen saturation does not exclude a clonal cause.
- Treating extreme thrombocytosis in ET with more aspirin when the cause of bleeding is acquired von Willebrand disease — aspirin must be stopped, not given.
- Calling leucocytosis with splenomegaly "CML" without a BCR-ABL1 test — a leukaemoid reaction from sepsis has a high LAP score and settles with treatment.
- Missing pre-fibrotic PMF behind a label of ET — check the marrow, LDH and megakaryocyte morphology.
- Forgetting that JAK2-positive splanchnic vein thrombosis can have a normal blood count.[1]
Prognosis — DIPSS decides PMF, TKIs rewrote CML
PV and ET have a near-normal or modestly reduced life expectancy with good control — median survival roughly 14 years (PV) and 20 years (ET) — but this is cut by thrombosis (the leading cause of death) and by transformation. PV carries a roughly 5 to 10 percent lifetime risk of AML and a 10 to 15 percent risk of progression to post-PV myelofibrosis; ET transforms to AML in 2 to 5 percent and to post-ET MF in roughly 10 percent.[1]
PMF carries the worst prognosis of the BCR-ABL1-negative trio (median survival 4 to 7 years overall, but dictated by DIPSS — from ~11 years in low-risk to ~2 years in high-risk); younger, transplant-eligible patients may be cured by allogeneic stem cell transplant.[1]
CML prognosis has been transformed by TKIs: 10-year overall survival of 85 to 90 percent with first-line imatinib, and even better with second-generation TKIs; the leading causes of death are now cardiovascular disease and second cancers rather than CML itself, and many patients on a TKI have a near-normal life expectancy. Blast-phase CML has a poor prognosis (median survival under a year without transplant).[3][4]
Adverse factors across the MPN include high-risk cytogenetics (complex karyotype, del(5q), monosomy 7 in PMF), high LDH and circulating blasts. Leukaemic transformation is highest in PMF. Follow-up is by serial full blood counts, holding the haematocrit under 0.45 in PV, monitoring symptoms and spleen size in PMF, BCR-ABL1 RT-PCR quarterly in CML, and surveillance for transformation (rising blasts, new cytopenias) alongside cardiovascular risk factor control.[1]
Median survival by MPN entity
CML (on TKI)
near-normal
Special populations
- Pregnancy — TKI treatment should be withheld during pregnancy (ELN 2020); plan conception on stable therapy with haematology-obstetric coordination. In PV, phlebotomy keeps the haematocrit below 45 percent and low-dose aspirin continues in the absence of contraindication.[4][11]
- Elderly — favour hydroxycarbamide (PV/ET) for tolerability and generic imatinib (cost-effective first-line CML treatment) when comorbidity and polypharmacy matter.[11][4]
- Children and young adults — interferon-alpha is the conventional second-line cytoreductive option where fertility-sparing therapy is preferred; second-generation TKIs aim at deep molecular response and possible treatment-free remission.[2][4]
- Immunocompromised — caution with ruxolitinib (thrombocytopenia and anaemia are its leading toxicities; non-haematologic toxicity is mostly grade 1 to 2) and screen before immunosuppressive therapy.[5]
- Anticoagulated patients — balance thrombosis against bleeding; in extreme thrombocytosis screen for acquired von Willebrand syndrome before aspirin because bleeding risk rises.[2]
- Surgery — venesect PV to a haematocrit under 0.45 preoperatively and ensure thromboprophylaxis.[11]
The trials that rewrote these diseases
Landmark trials and what they changed: the ECLAP randomised trial (Landolfi, NEJM 2004) showed that low-dose aspirin 100 mg daily reduced the composite of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, pulmonary embolism, major venous thrombosis or cardiovascular death in PV (relative risk 0.40) without a significant increase in major bleeding; the prospective European survey behind it (Marchioli, JCO 2005) followed 1638 patients with PV and identified age over 65 and prior thrombosis as the leading predictors of cardiovascular events, with antiplatelet therapy associated with lower cardiovascular risk; and CYTO-PV (Marchioli, NEJM 2013) randomised patients to a haematocrit target under 0.45 versus 0.45 to 0.50 and found fewer cardiovascular deaths and major thromboses with the tighter target — the basis for risk-adapted cytoreduction and the haematocrit target. Finally, COMFORT-II (Harrison, NEJM 2012) validated ruxolitinib over best available therapy for splenomegaly and symptoms in myelofibrosis.[6][9][14][5]
Population: 518 patients with polycythaemia vera, no clear indication for and no contraindication to aspirin
Key finding
Reduced the combined end point of nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, pulmonary embolism, major venous thrombosis or death from cardiovascular causes (relative risk 0.40); major bleeding not significantly increased
Practice change
Low-dose aspirin can safely prevent thrombotic complications in patients with polycythaemia vera who have no contraindications
The WHO 2016 and ICC/WHO 2022 revisions redefined MPN diagnosis around driver mutations (JAK2, CALR, MPL) integrated with marrow morphology, and recognised pre-fibrotic PMF as a distinct, higher-risk entity. CALR was discovered in 2013 (Nangalia, NEJM) as the dominant JAK2-negative driver in ET and PMF, and CALR-mutated disease carries a lower thrombotic risk and better survival than JAK2-mutated disease. Large genomic studies (Grinfeld, NEJM 2018) have begun to deliver personalised prognosis from integrated mutation profiles.[7][8]
Guideline bodies: NCCN (US), European LeukemiaNet (ELN 2020 for CML), BCSH / European Society for Medical Oncology, WHO, and in India ICMR / Blood Cancer India epidemiology and the Indian Council of Medical Research guidance. For CML, ELN 2020 is the global reference for TKI selection and molecular milestones.[4]
High-income settings (US, UK, Europe, Australia): routine access to JAK2/CALR/MPL testing, JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, momelotinib), pegylated interferon, all generations of CML TKIs (including ponatinib, asciminib), allogeneic transplant, and molecular monitoring on the International Scale; treatment-free remission programmes in specialist CML centres. [1]
India and low- and middle-income countries: management is hydroxycarbamide / aspirin / anticoagulation-led, driven by drug cost and variable access to JAK inhibitors, interferon, transplant and molecular monitoring. Imatinib dominates CML therapy (generic since 2016, widely affordable); second-generation TKIs and BCR-ABL1 PCR monitoring may be rationed by cost. Transplant access is concentrated in specialist centres. Splanchnic vein thrombosis with occult MPN is over-represented in regions with high infectious/inflammatory vascular disease.
Controversies: whether hydroxycarbamide is leukaemogenic (generally low-risk at standard doses, but debated in young patients); the role of early ruxolitinib in PV/ET; the milder phenotype of CALR-driven disease; transplant timing and intensity in PMF; JAK-inhibitor withdrawal; and the selection of patients for CML treatment-free remission versus lifelong TKI.[1]
Exam pearls
RAISE
- RRight-to-left shuntcyanotic congenital heart disease
- AAltitudechronic high-altitude living
- IIntrinsic lung diseaseCOPD, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic hypoxia
- SSmoking / Sleep apnoeachronic hypoxic drive
- EEPO-secreting tumourrenal cell carcinoma, HCC, uterine fibroid, cerebellar haemangioblastoma — inappropriate EPO
JCM
- JJAK2 V617FPV ~95 percent, ET/PMF 50 to 60 percent — pseudokinase (JH2) domain gain-of-function
- CCALR (calreticulin)~25 percent of ET and PMF; higher platelets, lower thrombosis, better survival
- MMPL~5 percent of ET/PMF; thrombopoietin receptor
- PV vs ET vs PMF — distinguished by the dominant lineage (red cells, platelets, fibrosis) and the film; JAK2, CALR and MPL are the mutually exclusive drivers in the BCR-ABL1-negative trio.
- CML — distinguished by BCR-ABL1 (Philadelphia t(9;22)), high WBC with basophilia, and dwarf megakaryocytes on marrow; treated with TKIs.
- DIPSS for PMF (Passamonti) — age over 65 years, haemoglobin under 100 g/L (10 g/dL), WBC over 25 x10^9/L, peripheral blasts 1 percent or higher, constitutional symptoms; risk categories low / intermediate-1 / intermediate-2 / high.[10]
- CML monitoring — quantitative BCR-ABL1 PCR on the International Scale; over 10 percent at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed; durable deep molecular response opens treatment-free remission.[4][3]
The mantra
JAK2 for PV, ET and myelofibrosis; Philadelphia for CML — and a high platelet that bleeds is still an MPN.[1][2]
Ward-round test — four stems, thirty seconds each
Stem 1 — the plethoric man from the top of the topicShowHide
The 58-year-old from Meet the patient: ruddy face, aquagenic pruritus after a hot shower, gout, Hct 0.58, JAK2 V617F positive, serum EPO low. Diagnosis and the first three management steps? Model: This is polycythaemia vera. (1) Phlebotomy to keep the haematocrit below 45 percent — required in every patient with PV. (2) Once-daily low-dose aspirin — the ECLAP trial dose was 100 mg daily; it reduced the composite thrombotic end point without significantly increasing major bleeding. (3) Cytoreduction with hydroxycarbamide, because age over 60 or prior thrombosis makes him high-risk. The single best discriminator you used — and the one to quote — is the low serum EPO alongside the JAK2 mutation.[11][6]
Stem 2 — Budd-Chiari with a normal blood countShowHide
A 32-year-old woman has abrupt abdominal pain, ascites and tender hepatomegaly. Doppler shows hepatic vein thrombosis (Budd-Chiari). Her full blood count is entirely normal. What test must you send, and why? Model: Send JAK2 V617F (and CALR, MPL) regardless of the normal count. Occult MPN is a leading cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis, and the count may not yet be abnormal at presentation. Manage her as an MPN: lifelong anticoagulation (LMWH then oral), cytoreduction if the counts later rise, and long-term surveillance for transformation. A normal count does not let you off the molecular hook.[1]
Stem 3 — platelets 1850 and bleeding; the registrar doubles the aspirinShowHide
A 66-year-old with known ET arrives with epistaxis and gum bleeding. Platelets 1850 x10^9/L, the rest normal. The night registrar prescribes more aspirin. What is the correct move, and what is the trap? Model: This is acquired von Willebrand syndrome from extreme thrombocytosis (the reviews flag platelets over 1000 x10^9/L) — and the guideline point is that AvWS screening is recommended before giving aspirin when thrombocytosis is extreme. The correct move: stop the aspirin and give urgent cytoreduction with hydroxycarbamide, the first-line cytoreductive drug in ET. The trap — high-yield and counterintuitive — is that extreme thrombocytosis causes bleeding, not only thrombosis. More aspirin is exactly wrong.[2][11]
Stem 4 — WBC 180 with basophilia and a palpable spleenShowHide
A 45-year-old man has an incidental WBC of 180 x10^9/L with a left shift and basophilia, platelets 700 x10^9/L, and a palpable spleen. Name the defining test, the first-line drug class, and the monitoring tool. Model: The defining test is BCR-ABL1 by RT-PCR plus FISH/karyotype for the Philadelphia chromosome t(9;22) — this is CML, and basophilia is a pointer. First-line therapy per ELN 2020: any of imatinib (brand or generic), dasatinib, nilotinib or bosutinib — generic imatinib is the cost-effective initial treatment in chronic phase. Monitoring is by quantitative BCR-ABL1 PCR on the International Scale; over 10 percent at 3 months indicates treatment failure when confirmed, and durable deep molecular response may open treatment-free remission.[4][3]
References14ShowHide
- [1]Greenfield G, McMullin MF, Mills K. Molecular pathogenesis of the myeloproliferative neoplasms J Hematol Oncol, 2021.PMID 34193229
- [2]Tefferi A, Barbui T. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management Am J Hematol, 2017.PMID 27991718
- [3]Senapati J, Sasaki K, Issa GC, Lipton JH, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E. Management of chronic myeloid leukemia in 2023 - common ground and common sense Blood Cancer J, 2023.PMID 37088793
- [4]Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia Leukemia, 2020.PMID 32127639
- [5]Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Gisslinger H, Waltzman RJ, Stalbovskaya V, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22375970
- [6]Landolfi R, Marchioli R, Kutti J, Gisslinger H, Tognoni G, Patrono C, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin in polycythemia vera N Engl J Med, 2004.PMID 14711910
- [7]Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, Nice FL, Gundem G, Wedge DC, et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2 N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 24325359
- [8]Grinfeld J, Nangalia J, Baxter EJ, Wedge DC, Angelopoulos N, Cantrill R, et al. Classification and Personalized Prognosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms N Engl J Med, 2018.PMID 30304655
- [9]Marchioli R, Finazzi G, Landolfi R, Kutti J, Gisslinger H, Patrono C, et al. Vascular and neoplastic risk in a large cohort of patients with polycythemia vera J Clin Oncol, 2005.PMID 15710945
- [10]Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Rumi E, Pereira A, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment) Blood, 2010.PMID 20008785
- [11]Tefferi A, Barbui T. Polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management Am J Hematol, 2019.PMID 30281843
- [13]Thiele J, Barbui T, Vannucchi AM, Tefferi A. Evolution of WHO diagnostic criteria in "Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasms" compared with the International Consensus Classification Blood Cancer J, 2025.PMID 40038244
- [14]Marchioli R, Finazzi G, Specchia G, Cacciola R, Cavazzina R, Cilloni D, et al. Cardiovascular events and intensity of treatment in polycythemia vera N Engl J Med, 2013.PMID 23216616
- [12]Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management Am J Hematol, 2021.PMID 33197049