MBBS OSCE · Cardiology
OSCE — Cardiogenic Shock
Eight-minute OSCE station on Cardiogenic Shock: focused history, examination priorities, investigations, emergency and definitive management.
On this page
Study tools
Exam tags
Brief (to candidate)
You will assess a patient with a presentation consistent with Cardiogenic Shock.
You have 8 minutes to take a focused history, outline examination, investigations, and management including red flags.[7]
Clinical context
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of end-organ hypoperfusion due to cardiac pump failure, defined for acute MI by SHOCK-trial criteria: systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg for at least 30 minutes (or vasopressors to maintain SBP at least 90), cardiac index at or below 2.2 L/min/m2, PCWP over 15 mmHg, and signs of hypoperfusion (cool peripheries, oliguria under 30 mL/hour). The commonest cause is acute MI — typically large anterior STEMI, but also right ventricular infarction and mechanical complications (papillary muscle rupture, ventricular septal rupture).[7][1]
Candidate tasks
- Clarify onset, severity, associated features, and red-flag symptoms.
- State focused examination priorities.
- List first-line investigations and any named score/criteria.
- Give immediate resuscitation steps.
- Outline definitive management with doses/routes where standard.
- Name complications and disposition (ward / HDU / theatre / discharge safety-net).
- Mention one special-population modifier (pregnancy, child, elderly, CKD).[2]
Examiner checklist
| Domain | Pass behaviours |
|---|---|
| Definition | Correct working diagnosis language |
| Assessment | Focused, prioritised, red flags sought |
| Investigations | Appropriate first-line + interpretation |
| Emergency care | ABC / time-critical actions first |
| Definitive care | Specific drugs/procedures, not generic phrases |
| Safety | Acute MI with hypotension (SBP below 90), oliguria, cold peripheries, confusion, raised lactate — escalate |
| Safety | New pansystolic murmur after MI with sudden haemodynamic collapse — papillary rupture or VSR; emergency echo |
| Safety | RV infarct (inferior MI, raised JVP, clear lung fields, hypotension) — preload-dependent; avoid nitrates |
| Communication | Clear plan and safety-netting |
Model outline
Lead with the working diagnosis and life threats. Resuscitate before definitive tests when unstable. Use guideline-standard therapy with named agents and doses. Document escalation criteria and follow-up. A safe candidate is specific, structured, and never delays critical care for non-urgent imaging.[7][1]
References9ShowHide
- [1]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators N Engl J Med, 1999.PMID 10460813
- [2]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD, et al. One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock JAMA, 2001.PMID 11176812
- [3]Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock N Engl J Med, 2012.PMID 22920912
- [4]Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 2017.PMID 29083953
- [5]De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock N Engl J Med, 2010.PMID 20200382
- [6]Mathew R, Di Santo P, Jung RG, et al. Milrinone as Compared with Dobutamine in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock N Engl J Med, 2021.PMID 34347952
- [7]Samsky MD, Morrow DA, Proudfoot AG, et al. Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review JAMA, 2021.PMID 34751704
- [8]Jentzer JC, van Diepen S, Barsness GW, et al. Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019.PMID 31548097
- [9]Forrester JS, Diamond GA, Swan HJ Correlative classification of clinical and hemodynamic function after acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol, 1977.PMID 835473