MBBS OSCE · cardiology
OSCE — Mitral Valve Prolapse
Eight-minute OSCE station on Mitral Valve Prolapse: focused history, examination priorities, investigations, emergency and definitive management.
On this page
Study tools
Exam tags
Brief (to candidate)
You will assess a patient with a presentation consistent with Mitral Valve Prolapse.
You have 8 minutes to take a focused history, outline examination, investigations, and management including red flags.
Clinical context
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the systolic billowing of one or both mitral leaflets above the mitral annulus into the left atrium, defined echocardiographically as leaflet displacement of more than 2 mm beyond the mitral annular plane in the parasternal long-axis view during systole. The underlying pathology is myxomatous degeneration of the leaflet (proteoglycan-rich matrix, fragmented collagen) with chordal elongation and often annular dilatation or mitral annular disjunction (MAD). MVP is the commonest primary valve abnormality in developed countries, with a population prevalence of 2 to 3 percent; in the Framingham offspring cohort it was 2.4 percent, and the age and sex distributions of those with prolapse matched those without, so the often-quoted 2:1 female predominance reflects referral series rather than the community. Clinically, two morphological phenotypes are recognised — fibroelastic deficiency (thin leaflets, focal P2 prolapse, chordal rupture, acute severe MR) and diffuse myxomatous Barlow's disease (multisegmental bileaflet billowing, dilated annulus, chronic severe MR). Most patients are asymptomatic with a mid-systolic click and late systolic murmur that moves earlier with Valsalva or standing and later with squatting; the station turns on grading the mitral regurgitation, recognising the arrhythmic phenotype, and knowing that endocarditis prophylaxis is not indicated for MVP.
Candidate tasks
- Clarify onset, severity, associated features, and red-flag symptoms.
- State focused examination priorities.
- List first-line investigations and any named score/criteria.
- Give immediate resuscitation steps.
- Outline definitive management with doses/routes where standard.
- Name complications and disposition (ward / HDU / theatre / discharge safety-net).
- Mention one special-population modifier (pregnancy, child, elderly, CKD).
Examiner checklist
| Domain | Pass behaviours |
|---|---|
| Definition | Correct working diagnosis language |
| Assessment | Focused, prioritised, red flags sought |
| Investigations | Appropriate first-line + interpretation |
| Emergency care | ABC / time-critical actions first |
| Definitive care | Specific drugs/procedures, not generic phrases |
| Safety | Sudden syncope, cardiac arrest or polymorphic VT/VF in a young patient with MVP and MAD - arrhythmic MVP; secondary prevention with an ICD, treat the MAD and MR |
| Safety | New acute severe MR after chordal rupture - pulmonary oedema and cardiogenic shock; urgent repair, vasodilator and IABP bridge |
| Safety | New neurological deficit in MVP with AF - cardioembolic stroke; anticoagulate, rate or rhythm control, treat the MR |
| Communication | Clear plan and safety-netting |
Model outline
Lead with the working diagnosis and life threats. Resuscitate before definitive tests when unstable. Use guideline-standard therapy with named agents and doses. Document escalation criteria and follow-up. A safe candidate is specific, structured, and never delays critical care for non-urgent imaging.