MBBS SAQ · Nephrology / Urology

Painless visible haematuria — evaluation pathway and the glomerular vs urological distinction

A final-prof / NEET-PG SAQ on the evaluation of painless visible haematuria — the cardinal rule (cancer until proven otherwise), the glomerular vs urological split (settled by urine microscopy), the role of cystoscopy and CT urogram, and the management of anticoagulant-associated haematuria.

On this page
Study tools

Exam tags

NEET-PGINICETUSMLEPLAB
Question
10 marks10 min
A 65-year-old male smoker presents with three weeks of painless visible haematuria, with small clots but no dysuria, no colic and no LUTS. He takes warfarin for atrial fibrillation (INR in range). Examination: BP 140/85, no abdominal masses, prostate smooth and enlarged on DRE. Urine dipstick is strongly blood-positive; microscopy shows isomorphic red blood cells, no casts, no proteinuria. Outline your assessment, the pivotal diagnostic distinction, and the stepwise investigation and management.

Write your answer

Saved on this device. No marking — you are the marker.

Painless visible haematuria — evaluation pathway and the glomerular vs urological distinction · MBBS SAQ · NeetVellum